Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

EuroPCR 2026 | Could clopidogrel replace aspirin as monotherapy after PCI?

This presentation, delivered during EuroPCR 2026, analyzed the clinical outcomes of clopidogrel monotherapy versus aspirin in patients who remained event-free for 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Historically, aspirin has been the cornerstone of long-term antiplatelet therapy. However, emerging evidence suggests that P2Y12 inhibitors such as clopidogrel may provide greater efficacy and better gastrointestinal tolerability. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of both drugs in a real-world setting, with a particular focus on challenging subgroups, including patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) and/or complex PCI.

A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at Fuwai Hospital (China), including 5,664 patients who had completed standard 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) without adverse events. The population was divided into two monotherapy groups: clopidogrel (n=1,974) and aspirin (n=3,690).

The primary endpoint was the incidence of net adverse clinical events (NACE) at 36 months, defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding.

Read also: EuroPCR 2026 | Are bioresorbable stents making a comeback? Five-year results of FUTURE-II with Firesorb.

The results demonstrated a significant reduction in NACE in favor of clopidogrel, with a significantly lower incidence compared with aspirin (2.5% vs 4.7%; HR 0.52; p<0.001). In addition, the risk of major cardiac or cerebral events — including death, myocardial infarction, or stroke — was also substantially lower with clopidogrel (1.3% vs 3.0%; HR 0.43; p<0.001).

Clopidogrel also showed a trend toward lower rates of clinically relevant bleeding (BARC 2, 3, or 5), although this finding did not reach strict statistical significance (1.2% vs 1.9%; p=0.077). The net clinical benefit of clopidogrel remained consistent regardless of bleeding risk (HBR) or PCI complexity.

Conclusion: Clopidogrel reduced cardiovascular events versus aspirin as post-PCI monotherapy

In patients who remain event-free after completing the standard DAPT period, clopidogrel appears to provide better long-term clinical protection than aspirin and could therefore be considered a preferred maintenance strategy, even in high bleeding risk or complex PCI settings.

Original Title: Net Clinical Outcomes of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy after Coronary Stenting by Bleeding Risk and PCI Complexity.

Reference: Presentado por Hao-Yu Wang en EuroPCR 2026.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

EuroPCR 2026 | Is localized anticoagulation the next step for coronary stents?

The DESyne BDS Plus stent was developed as a thin-strut, bioabsorbable polymer drug-eluting stent that combines sirolimus release with two anticoagulant agents (rivaroxaban and...

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

EuroPCR 2026 | Are bioresorbable stents making a comeback? Five-year results of FUTURE-II with Firesorb

The first bioresorbable coronary scaffolds generated great expectations because of their potential to restore vascular physiology after device resorption. However, early studies such as...

EuroPCR 2026 | Coronary bioadaptor: fewer events regardless of IVUS or FFR guidance

Despite the increasing use of intracoronary imaging and physiology, stent-related events continue to occur at an annual rate of approximately 2–3% beyond the first...

EuroPCR 2026 | Is localized anticoagulation the next step for coronary stents?

The DESyne BDS Plus stent was developed as a thin-strut, bioabsorbable polymer drug-eluting stent that combines sirolimus release with two anticoagulant agents (rivaroxaban and...