Multivessel angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction improves prognosis

Original title: Acute multivessel revascularization improves 1 year outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. A nationwide study from AMIS plus registry. Reference: Raban Jeger, et al. International journal of Cardiology 2014;172:76-81

 

The presence of multiple vessel lesions is present in about 50% of patients referred for primary angioplasty. The accepted strategy is to treat the culprit artery even though there are not sufficient studies regarding the when and how to treat other arteries with severe injuries. 1909 patients in the National Myocardial Infarction Register of Switzerland were admitted experiencing a ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and had multivessel disease, of whom 442 (23 %) had multivessel angioplasty and 1467 (77%) only responsible vessel angioplasty.

The primary end point of the study was death from any cause and the secondary, a composite of death, myocardial reinfarction, rehospitalization for cardiac causes, and any heart reintervention and stroke. Both populations’ characteristics were similar with the exception of increased cerebrovascular disease in a group where only culprit vessel was treated, and a major Killip class in the group treated for multiple vessels. In both, medical treatment at discharge was similar. With a median follow-up of 378 days, death for any cause (primary end point) was identical in both groups (2.7%, P> 0.99) unlike the combined secondary end point that was significantly lower in those with multivessel angioplasty (15.6% versus 20%, p = 0.038). This difference was based on the rehospitalizations and reinterventions and not in deaths or reinfarctions. Those who received drug-eluting stent angioplasty to multivessel had lower mortality (2.1 % versus 7.4%, P = 0.026) and lower combined events (14.1% versus 25.9%, p = 0.042) compared with those receiving conventional stents and this benefit was maintained beyond two years. 

Conclusion

In a population unselected from a real world, an immediate complete revascularization strategy may be beneficial during primary angioplasty considering the combined events and especially using drug-eluting stents. This should be tested in randomized trials.

Comment

The strategy of performing a multi-vessel angioplasty during primary angioplasty has been demonstrated already in several studies as feasible, safe, and that reduces the event rate, primarily due to the lower rate of reinterventions and rehospitalizations. The use of DES has also proven to be safe and beneficial. It would be important to conduct larger controlled studies to identify the groups that benefit most from this strategy.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava
Interventional cardiologist
Favaloro Foundation – Argentina 

Dr. Carlos Fava para SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...