Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment of choice, achieving patency of the infarct-related artery before the procedure has been associated with smaller infarct size and improved clinical outcomes. In this context, the optimal timing for administering unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains a matter of debate.

The HEPARIN-STEMI study was a randomized, open-label, single-center trial that enrolled 593 patients presenting with STEMI within 6 hours of symptom onset. Participants were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous bolus of UFH (70–100 IU/kg) at the first prehospital medical contact or according to the conventional strategy of administration at the beginning of primary PCI. The primary efficacy endpoint was the presence of TIMI 2/3 flow in the infarct-related artery before PCI, while the primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of BARC 3–5 major bleeding during hospitalization.

Early UFH administration significantly increased the initial patency of the culprit artery, with TIMI 2–3 flow observed in 43% of patients compared with 27% in the control group (RR 1.59; 95% CI: 1.27–1.98; p<0.001), representing an absolute 16% increase in spontaneous reperfusion before PCI. This benefit was achieved without prolonging reperfusion times.

Read also: SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients.

From a safety perspective, early treatment did not increase the risk of major bleeding, which occurred in 2.4% of patients receiving prehospital UFH and 2.0% of those treated according to the conventional strategy (RR 1.16; 95% CI: 0.39–3.45; p=0.789). These findings reinforce that early anticoagulation can be implemented safely, without a clear association with an increased risk of hemorrhagic events when incorporated into a primary PCI protocol.

Conclusions: Prehospital heparin improves early reperfusion without increasing bleeding risk

The HEPARIN-STEMI study demonstrates that administering unfractionated heparin at the first medical contact significantly improves the initial patency of the infarct-related artery without increasing the risk of major bleeding. This is a simple, widely available, and low-cost intervention that enhances early reperfusion and provides new evidence supporting its routine use in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

Original Title: Prehospital Heparin Administration in Patients With STEMI Undergoing Primary PCI: HEPARIN-STEMI Randomized Controlled Trial.

Reference: Fister M, Noc M, Radsel P, Bunc M, Franco D, Goslar T; HEPARIN-STEMI Trial. Prehospital Heparin Administration in Patients With STEMI Undergoing Primary PCI: HEPARIN-STEMI Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2026 May 19;153(20):1526-1534. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.126.079839. Epub 2026 Mar 30. PMID: 41910504.


 

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...