Beta Blockers Could Improve Outcomes in Carotid Artery Stenting

Original Title: Beta-blocker use is associated with lower stroke and death after carotid artery stenting. Reference: Tammman Obeid, et al. J Vasc. Surg. 2016;63:363-9.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

The latest trials on Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) have shown significantly improved effectiveness. The use of drugs such as beta blockers (BB) have proved beneficial in some studies, though it remains controversial.

5263 patients undergoing CAS were analyzed; 2152 (40%) had never received BB, 259 (4%) received BB between 1 and 30 days prior stenting and 2837 (53.9%) had been receiving BB >30 days prior procedure.

The groups were similar, mean age was 68 and most of them were men.

At 30 days, death and stoke rate was 3.4% (minor stroke 1.5%, major stroke 0.9% and death 1.2%) and there were no MI cases. 40% of patients presenting major stroke died within 30 days after procedure. 22% presented post procedural hypotension, unrelated to the use of BB. Instead, hypertension requiring treatment was 9.9% and it was frequent between patients receiving BB between days 1 and 30; it was associated to a 3.4 fold increase in stroke/death incidence (OR 3.39; CI 95% 2.3-5.00; p<0.0001). Hemorrhagic stroke was 0.5%, increased 8 fold by post procedural hypertension.

The use of BB more than 30 days prior procedure was associated to a 34% reduction of stroke/death rate (OR 0.66; CI 95% 0.46-0.95; p<0.025).

Other predictors of stroke/death were age, diabetes, symptomatic lesions and post-procedural hypotension, whereas prior endarterectomy and the use of protection systems resulted protective.

Conclusion
Hypertension and hypotension that require treatment, are strongly associated with stroke and death after CAS. BB significantly reduce periprocedural stroke/death rates. To better assess the potential of these drugs in CAS calls for further prospective research.

Editorial Comment
This is a retrospective study but it includes a significant number of patients. It shows that a simple and low cost strategies can render considerable benefits in harsh events, in addition to experience and rigorous hemodynamic control, which are essential to achieve better results.

Further randomized studies are necessary to find out who will benefit most from the use of BB.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.
Interventional Cardiologist
Favaloro Foundation – Buenos Aires

More articles by this author

A New Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Paradigm? CREST-2 Trial Unified Results

Severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis continues to be controversial seeing the optimization of intensive medical therapy (IMT) and the availability lower periprocedural risk revascularization techniques....

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...