Successful recanalization of total occlusion: No improvement of long-term survival

Original Title: Successful Recanalization of Native Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Is Not Associated With Improved Long-Term Survival.
Reference: Pil Hyung Lee et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016. Online before print.

 

The aim of this study was to assess long term clinical outcomes after successful recanalization of chronic total occlusion (CTO) with DES implantation.

Between March 2003 and May 2014, 1173 native coronary CTO consecutive patients undergoing PCI were analyzed. DES were implanted in all successful procedures (1,004 patients, 85.6%).

At a median follow up of 4.6 years, all-cause mortality risk (HR: 1.04; IC 95% 0.53 to 2.04; p=0.92) and the combined risk of death and infarction (HR: 1.05 IC 95% 0.56 a 1.94; p=0.89) were comparable between successful and unsuccessful recanalization patients.

Neither were there differences between those patients with other compromised vessels, in addition to the one totally occluded (n=879), receiving complete revascularization, vs. those with incomplete revascularization for unsuccessful recanalization.

These finding were consistent between patients with multivessel disease and those with only the one occluded vessel.

Conclusion
Successful recanalization of CTO compared to unsuccessful recanalization was not associated with a reduction of hard events, such as death. However, successful recanalization was associated to a significate lower chance of CABG following CTO.

Editorial Comment
The different strategies to treat severely compromised, yet not occluded, vessels, the high rate of surgery following unsuccessful recanalization, and the high successful rate with very few serious complications, all contributed to the neutral outcome of this study.

The real prognostic impact of recanalizations should be decided between successful PCI vs. optimal medical treatment.

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...