Extreme Valve Calcification in TAVI might compromise technical success

Original Title: Ballon-Expandable Trancatheter Aortic valve Replacement in Patients whit Extreme Aortic Valve Calcification.

Reference: Yigal Abramowitz, et al. Catetherization and Cardiovascular Intervention 2016;87:117-1179.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

calcification taviTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) emerged as a valid option to treat high risk inoperable patients. A group of these patients presents extreme valve calcification and outcomes remain unclear.

The study analyzed 299 undergoing TAVI with the Edwards-Sapiens or Sapiens XT valve. Extreme calcification was defined as >8,000 Agatston units in CT scan prior procedure.

From the total number of patients, 20 (6.7%) presented extreme calcification; this group had the elderly patients (84.9 ± 6.6 vs. 82.4 ± 8.2 years; p=0.1), more frequently men, with the highest mean and peak gradients (56.1/89.4 vs. 44.1/77.1 mmHg; p=0.02 for both), and CT scan showed larger aortic annulus and area.

Implantation success in this group with extreme calcification was lower (80% vs. 95.3% p=0.004), which required longer procedural and fluoroscopy time and larger contrast volume.

Paravalvular regurgitation was higher in the group with extreme calcification, researchers saw:

(p=0.01)

-50% no regurgitation

-35% mild regurgitation

-10% moderate

5% severe

Compared to the control group, that showed:

-72.4% no regurgitation

-25.8% mild regurgitation

-1.8% moderate

-0% severe

Rates of in-hospital evolution, 30 day mortality, the need for definite pacemaker and major complications were similar.

Follow up was at 16 months, with no difference in mortality or major complications.

 

Conclusion

Balloon expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with extreme valve calcification is associated with lower implantation success rate and higher risk of paravalvular regurgitation.

 

 Editorial Comment

It has been shown extreme calcification reduces implantation success and increases paravalvular regurgitation which, when moderate or severe, is associated with lower technical success rate.

The limitation to this analyzis is that patients with severe calcification are limited in number and follow up is little longer than a year.

With the new valves currently available, implantation success and regurgitation may improve.

We need a larger study with longer follow up.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Fundación Favaloro. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

 

Your opinion matters to us. You are most welcome to leave your comment, reflection, question or any ideas down below.

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...