Patients with Resistant Hypertension: Nearly 50% doesn’t take medication

Resistant HypertensionThe DENERHTN trial (Renal Denervation for Hypertension) confirmed the efficacy of renal denervation in addition to antihypertensive standard care in patients with resistant hypertension.

 

This study reports the influence of adherence to treatment to control blood pressure. It included 106 patients with resistant hypertension after four week treatment with indapamide 1.5 mg/day, ramipril 10 mg/day (or irbesartan 300 mg/day) and amlodipine 10 mg/day, randomized to renal denervation and stepped-care of other drugs vs. the same antihypertension treatment.

 

For stepped-care, patients received spironolactone 25 mg/day, bisoprolol 10 mg/day, prazosin 5 mg/day and rilmenidine 1 mg/day, consecutively added at monthly visits if blood pressure was ≥135/85 mm Hg.

 

The number of fully adherent patients (20/40 vs. 21/45), partially non-adherent (13/40 vs. 20/45) and completely non-adherent (7/40 vs. 4/45) to antihypertensive drugs resulted similar between the group randomized to renal denervation and the control group, respectively (p=0.3605).

 

The difference in ambulatory systolic blood pressure between both groups was –6.7 mmHg (p=0.3605) in patients completely adherent and –7.8 mm Hg (p=0.0996) in non-adherent patients.

 

Conclusion

The prevalence of non-adherence to antihypertension drugs at six months was close to 50%, but did not differ between the renal denervation group and the control group. Regardless of adherence to treatment, renal denervation in addition to standard stepped care with antihypertension drugs resulted in greater reduction of blood pressure compared to standard care.

Original Title: Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment and the Blood Pressure–Lowering Effects of Renal Denervation in the Renal Denervation for Hypertension (DENERHTN) Trial.

Reference: Michel Azizi et al. Circulation. 2016 Sep 20;134(12):847-57.

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comment, suggestions, or questions here below.

More articles by this author

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...