4 Readmission Predictors after Successful TAVR

4 Readmission Predictors after Successful TAVRReadmissions are frequent after cardiovascular procedures and they significantly increase healthcare costs. Data on readmission need within the first month after successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are limited.

 

The registry included all TAVR patients surviving index hospitalization between January and February 2013 for readmission incidence, predictors, causes and costs within 30 days.

 

Of 12,221 included patients, 2,188 (17.9%) required readmission within 30 days.

 

Readmission predictors were:

  • length of stay longer than 5 days during index hospitalization
  • kidney injury (both acute and chronic)
  • transapical access
  • chronic lung disease

 

61.8% of these was due to non-cardiac causes and the remaining 38.2% was due to cardiac causes. Respiratory causes (14.7%), infections (12.8%), bleeding (7.6%) and peripheral vascular disease (4.3%) were the most common among non-cardiac causes, while heart failure (22.5%) and arrhythmia was the most common among cardiac causes (6.6%).

 

Readmissions median length was four more days.

 

Conclusion

Readmissions at 30 days after TAVR are frequent and are associated with comorbidities, access site and complications during index hospitalization. These predictors could alert about patients at high risk of readmission and prevent major complications.  

 

Original Title: Thirty-Day Readmissions after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States. Insights from the Nationwide Readmissions Database.

Reference: Dhaval Kolte et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan;10(1).


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...