TAVR: Reasons to Consider Mitral Annular Calcification

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

TAVR: Reasons to Consider Mitral Annular CalcificationAortic valve calcification and mitral annular calcification have the same etiology and are frequently present in high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The implications of mitral annular calcification for patients undergoing TAVR has not been entirely clarified yet.

 

The study examined 782 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR. Among these patients, 375 (49.9%) presented mitral annular calcification in the computerized tomography scan:

  • Mild: 30.4%
  • Moderate: 9.5%
  • Severe: 9.5%

 

Patients who experienced the highest rate of mitral annular calcification were the eldest (83 vs. 81.9 years old), those with chronic renal insufficiency, and those with a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (8.8 vs. 7.5; p <0,001).

 

Procedural success was similar for all patients, and no differences in mortality and major complications were observed at 30 daysAt 1 year, severe mitral annular calcification was found to be an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-3.07; p = 0.004) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.19-4.66; p = 0.01). Furthermore, it was an independent predictor of the need for a new permanent pacemaker after TAVR (odds ratio [OR]: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.08-7.47; p = 0.03).

 

Conclusion

Half of the patients with severe aortic stenosis experience mitral annular calcification. Severe mitral annular calcification is associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and with conduction disorders after TAVR. This pathology should be included in future risk stratification models.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Buenos Aires Favaloro Foundation, Argentina.

 

Original title: Concomitant Mitral Annular Calcification and Severe Aortic Stenosis: Prevalence, Characteristics and Outcome Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Reference: Yigal Abramowitz, et al. European Heart Journal Advance Access published December 30, 2016.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...