ACC 2018 | Flu Vaccination Reduces Mortality in Heart Failure Hospitalizations

Heart failure patients vaccinated against influenza are at a significantly lower risk of dying, both during flu season and outside of it.

Patients with heart failure vaccinated had a 48% lower risk of death during influenza season and a 21% lower risk during the rest of the year.

Dr. Fukuta, lead investigator in this study, explained that flu vaccination of heart failure patients in Japan is not formally recommended. Larger-scale and adequately powered randomized controlled trials, such as INVESTED, will provide a definitive answer.

At the moment, with some inconsistent results, we must settle for this meta-analysis led by Dr. Fukuta, which includes 5 observational studies involving a total of 78,882 patients with heart failure. The age of patients ranged from 64 to 75 years old, and study follow-up was between 1 and 4 years.


Read also: ACC 2018 | Risk of MI in Non-Cardiac Surgeries.


There are physiopathologic reasons supporting vaccination, such as the fact that respiratory infections (including influenza) are the precipitating cause of heart failure and are associated with increased mortality. If vaccination reduces the incidence and/or severity of these respiratory infections, it will prevent heart failure exacerbations, hospitalization, and associated mortality.

Furthermore, vaccination reduces the risk of cardiovascular events, including infarction and unstable angina, in patients with coronary artery disease. There are studies showing a sixfold higher risk of infarction in the week after a flu diagnosis. In such cases, physiopathology is probably related to inflammation.

Original title: The Effect of Influenza Vaccination on Mortality and Hospitalization in Patients with Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.

Presenter: Fukuta H.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

TAVR in Young Low-Risk Patients

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has established itself as an effective strategy for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis across different risk groups. While previous...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...