Risk of Colonic Ischemia after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

This is the largest and most recent analyzis to show colonic ischemia is more frequent after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (2.1% a 3.6%), compared against endovascular repair (0.5% a 1%), especially in elective patients.

Riesgo de isquemia colónica luego de la reparación de aneurisma de aorta abdominalMost cases presented within the first 7 days. The evidence is not enough to determine the cause behind the different in incidence of colonic ischemia between both techniques, but it does highlight the importance of performing a colectomy procedure. Most randomized studies comparing open vs. Endovascular repair did not report specifically on colonic ischemia incidence, nor its sequels, and given the high morbidity and mortality of this complication, we should look further into it.

 

This meta-analyzis included 13 studies specifically reporting on this complication after elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, with a total 162750 patients (78151 undergoing endovascular repair and 84599 open surgical repair).


Read also: What Is the Prognosis for Reinterventions in Critical Lower Limb Ischemia?


All studies found that colonic ischemia is more frequent with open repair compared against endovascular repair.

 

In most cases, this complication appeared within 30 days (and specifically within the first 7 days) and it was associated with variable mortality (from 0 to 73%).


Read also: Maintaining Physical Activity After an Acute Myocardial Infarction Reduces Mortality.


The studies are heterogeneous, both as regards methodology and events rate (colonic ischemia, reinterventions, mortality and time to complication development).

 

Conclusion

Despite the high study heterogeneity, it seems clear that colonic ischemia is more frequent with open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms than with endovascular repair.

 

Original title: Elective Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and the Risk of Colonic Ischaemia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Reference: Jeremy S. Williamson et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2018). Article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

A New Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Paradigm? CREST-2 Trial Unified Results

Severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis continues to be controversial seeing the optimization of intensive medical therapy (IMT) and the availability lower periprocedural risk revascularization techniques....

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...