ESC 2018 | ARRIVE: Aspirin in the Eye of the Storm of Primary Prevention

Aspirin failed to reach the primary endpoint in a population that was at risk of experiencing cardiovascular disease. However, something that a short time ago seemed obvious could not be proved by randomizing 12,000 patients.

ARRIVE: la aspirina en el ojo de la tormenta de la prevención primariaThe ARRIVE trial, presented at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress 2018 and simultaneously published in The Lancet, joins the ASCEND trial and together force aspirin against the ropes as regards the primary prevention setting.

 

The role of aspirin in the secondary prevention of coronary disease and stroke, as well as in the setting of acute myocardial infarction or stroke, is not under discussion, but its use for primary prevention is another thing entirely.

 

The ARRIVE trial sought to establish the safety and efficacy of enteric-coated aspirin 100 mg/day vs. placebo in 12,546 patients whose risk of experiencing cardiovascular events at 10 years was moderate (between 10 and 20%).


Read also: Highlights from EuroPCR 2018.


At 60 months, the observed event rate was 9%, considerably less than the anticipated 17%. While different scores placed this population in the moderate risk category, it behaved as a low risk population, given the event rate below 10%.

 

For the primary endpoint (occurrence of cardiovascular death, infarction, unstable angina, stroke, or transient ischemic attack), there were no significant differences between the groups randomized to aspirin or placebo (4.29% vs. 4.48%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-1.13).


Read also: Highlights from ACC 2018.


The rate of gastrointestinal bleeding was low, less than 1%, but twice as high in the aspirin group; in consequence, this small absolute difference becomes a statistically significant difference in over 12,000 patients.

 

Original title: Use of Aspirin to Reduce Risk of Initial Vascular Events in Patients at Moderate Risk of Cardiovascular Disease (ARRIVE): A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Reference: Presented by J. Michael Gaziano at the European Society of Cardiology 2018 Congress and simultaneously published in The Lancet. 2018;Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

Ultrathin vs Thin-Strut Stents in PCI Patients at High Bleeding Risk

Several in vivo studies have shown that ultrathin stents present lower thrombogenic risk vs. thin-strut stents, which reflects in lower rates of target lesion...

Should We Withdraw Anticoagulation Before TAVR?

Approximately one-third of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have atrial fibrillation and are on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. This creates a complex...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...