A Simple Trick to Improve Our Transradial Punctures

Transradial access is here to stay; that much has been clear for some time now. However, some operators still resist change and the systematic use of this technique shows great geographical dispersion. Some of its limitations are a difficulty to obtain access and the somewhat frequent occurrence of radial artery occlusion after the procedure. This study assessed a very simple resource to avoid artery occlusion: an injection of nitroglycerin at the puncture site.

Un truco sencillo para mejorar nuestras punciones radialesThis work included 188 patients undergoing transradial catheterization who were randomized to subcutaneous injection of 0.5 mL 0.1% nitroglycerin at the puncture site or a placebo. All patients were assessed through ultrasound examinations before and at 24 hours after the procedure.

 

Upon comparison of the radial artery diameter before and after the procedure, patients in the nitroglycerin-treated group presented a significantly greater diameter than patients in the placebo control group. Most importantly, the incidence of occlusion was substantially lower in the nitroglycerin-treated group (5.4% vs. 14.4%; p = 0.04).


Read also: Antiaggregation Time after Treating Bifurcations.


There were no significant differences in other complications (forearm hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, etc.).

 

Conclusion

Subcutaneous injection of nitroglycerin at the radial artery puncture site increases the radial artery diameter and reduces the incidence of radial artery occlusion post-catheterization.

 

Original title: Subcutaneous Injection of Nitroglycerin at the Radial Artery Puncture Site Reduces the Risk of Early Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Coronary Catheterization. A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Reference: Yequn Chen et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:e006571.

 

2018-08-31-NTG-subcutánea-full


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...