AHA 2018 | No Benefits with Methothrexate as Anti-Inflammatory Drug

Low-dose methotrexate (a nonspecific anti-inflammatory agent used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune disorders) did not prevent cardiovascular events in patients with a prior infarction or multivessel coronary artery disease, according to this study presented at the American Heart Association (AHA) Congress and published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

AHA 2018 | El metotrexate como anti inflamatorio no logró mostrar beneficiosThis study, called CIRT (Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial), dashes our hopes of treating residual inflammatory risk with a relatively inexpensive drug.

 

Methotrexate had no effect on interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, or C-reactive protein levels as markers of inflammation.

 

These results contrast with the CANTOS trial, which showed that canakinumab (a human monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin-1β) reduces cardiovascular events when added to optimal medical therapy.


Read also: AHA 2018 | New Physical Activity Guidelines Recommend Movement for All Ages.


The CIRT study randomized patients with previous infarction or multivessel coronary artery disease in addition to type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome to low-dose methotrexate (15-20 mg) or placebo.

 

The trial was stopped due to a lack of benefit derived from the drug vs. placebo, after a mean follow-up of 2.3 years and once 4786 of the 6158 eligible patients had completed the randomization and treatment phase.

 

Original title: Low-Dose Methotrexate for the Prevention of Atherosclerotic Events.

Reference: Ridker PM et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Epub ahead of print.

 

Dispositivo-Impella-gana-evidencia


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....