Less Bivalirudin and Minimal Use of Ultrasound for Puncture Is the Worldwide Trend in Transradial Access

A worldwide survey shows there is much room for improvement as regards transradial access procedures, particularly for the prevention of radial artery occlusion post-procedure.

acceso_radialWhile in many places this has been a standard technique for some time now, other places are yet to evolve, and that is the result of this survey. In the past 8 years, a great number of interventional cardiologists have adopted this technique for both diagnosis and treatment, but there remains a wide variation in its use worldwide.

 

In this survey, investigators found that a large proportion of operators (both inside and outside the United States) still do not adhere to the recommendations considered as clinical best practices.


Read also: ESC 2018 | MATRIX: 1-Year Superiority of Transradial Access.


For example, nearly 30% of operators do not routinely assess for artery patency after achieving hemostasis and only 63.2% of them check for patency before discharge. Additionally, there has been an increase in the use of heparin over bivalirudin, but many physicians give less than the dose required to reduce the risk of artery occlusion (5000 units).

 

This international survey on transradial access (which was recently published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions) is the second survey conducted on this subject. In the first survey (published in 2010), fewer than 10% of US operators surveyed used this technique, while, in the latest survey, nearly 40% of respondents said they do. Among them, 70% began their learning curve between 2007 and 2015.

 

Only a minority of operators perform routine testing for dual circulation (Allen testing), particularly outside the United States. Testing for dual circulation has not been shown to predict the risk of future complications.


Read also: Manual vs. Mechanical Compression after Transradial Catheterization.


Among the most noticeable changes (compared with 2010) are the use of hydrophilic introducer sheaths, preventing radial artery occlusion, and the use of the contralateral radial artery rather than the femoral artery if the initial access attempt fails.

 

The use of Doppler ultrasound for puncture differs significantly between US operators (usually less experienced) and other operators. In the United States, ultrasound guidance is used in about 50% of all cases, while non-US cardiologists carry out direct punctures in 92.6% of all cases.

 

Original title: Contemporary Transradial Access Practices: Results of the Second International Survey.

Reference: Shroff AR et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...