Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Safety in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surveillance Programs

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) rupture rate in the UK justifies the current surveillance programs and bring ease to some physicians that at some point have cast a shadow on their efficacy. This study also endorses reference thresholds to intervene patients.

El tratamiento endovascular parece superior a la cirugía en aneurismas rotosIn 2009, the UK National Health Service (NHS) implemented a AAA national surveillance scheme where men over 65 were eligible for screening. Those with ≥5.5 cm aneurysms were sent to consult with a vascular surgeon, while those with smaller aneurysms were invited to enter an ultrasound surveillance program.

 

AAA treatment guidelines were published in 2003, estimating a 3 to 15% rupture risk for aneurysms between 5 and 5.9 cm. More recent guidelines have estimated a 1% rupture risk a year for aneurysms under 5.5 cm.


Read also: Several Features Define a Hostile Neck in AAA patients, but Only One Makes the Difference.


This study looked at over 18,000 men between 2009 and 2017 that took part in the surveillance scheme and starting with AAA between 3 and 5.5 cm. The study did not include women, since AAA incidence in women is significantly lower.

 

During the follow up period, some 1763 patients reached 5.5 cm or higher measures and were referred to a peripheral vascular physician for definite treatment. Some 83 with smaller aneurysms were also sent to a specialist based on their symptoms, rapid growth and other alarming signs. Finally, 31 patients had aneurysm rupture, and 29 of these patients died.

 

These figures result in an estimated risk of 1 in 100 patients/year for all diameters bellow 5.5 cm.


Read also: Risk of Colonic Ischemia after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.


Risk is in direct correlation with diameter: it goes from 0.03% for smaller aneurysms (between 3 and 4.4 cm) to 0.4% for AAA right below the reference threshold (5.0 to 5.4 cm).

 

Since rupture risk in this cohort is so low, we can conclude that the surveillance program is safe.

 

Original title: Safety of men with small and medium abdominal aortic aneurysms under surveillance in the national health service screening program.

Reference: Oliver-Williams C et al. Circulation. 2019; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

SCAI 2026 | Deep vein arterialization as an alternative in patients with critical limb ischemia without conventional options

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents one of the most advanced stages of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In a significant proportion of patients, distal anatomy,...

C-TRACT: Endovascular therapy in post-thrombotic syndrome due to iliac obstruction

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is one of the most limiting sequelae following proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It clinically manifests as chronic pain, edema, skin...

Coil embolization of segmental arteries as a spinal cord protection strategy prior to complex endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aorta

Spinal cord ischemia remains one of the most devastating complications in the repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, with incidences of up to 20–30% in extensive...

Mechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulation in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) has anticoagulation as the standard treatment, while reperfusion strategies remain a matter of debate. In this context, mechanical thrombectomy has...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...