Transcaval Access Is Safe in TAVR

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

One of the limitations to percutaneous interventions is poor or impossible femoral access. This happens especially in TAVR, with endoprosthesis or ventricular assistance devices, when the transcaval approach with cardiac occluder rises as a viable alternative. We have started to use it in TAVR, but at present there is little information on this access site.

acceso carotideo taviThe study looked at 100 patients undergoing TAVR via transcaval approach with Amplatzer Duct Occluder or Amplatzer Muscular VSD Occluder (Abbott Vascular, Minneapolis, Minnesota). In one of them, it was impossible to use this access site.

 

Mean age was 80, most were women, mortality STS was 9.7% and EuroSCORE was 11%.

 

At one year follow up, 22 patients died, mostly for cardiovascular complications. After 30 days, the most frequent cause for hospitalization was cardiac failure, which was associated with mortality (8 of 12 [75%]; hazard ratio: 13.0; p < 0.001) with no vascular complications.


Read also: Paladin: New Carotid Protection System with Good Results.


83 patients received CT. Only one patient presented vena cava fistula and patent aorta not associated with mortality or hospitalization for cardiac failure (15% if patent vs. 23% if occluded; p= 0.30). There was no vascular injury, Amplatzer migration or fracture.

 

Conclusion

At one year after transcaval TAVR and closure using permeable nitinol occluders off-label, outcomes are reassuring. There were no major vascular complications and CT showed spontaneous closure of almost all fistulas.

 

Results may be different in a lower-risk cohort, with increased operator experience, and using a dedicated transcaval closure device.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

Original title: The Fate of Transcaval Access Tracts 12-Month Results of the Prospective NHLBI Transcaval Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Study.

Reference: Robert J. Lederman, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019;12:448–56


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...