E-Cigarettes vs. Nicotine Therapy to Stop Smoking

E-cigarettes were more effective for smoking cessation than nicotine-replacement therapy according to this randomized study recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). Both must be accompanied by medical and psychological support for optimal results.

Enfermedad pulmonar y cigarrillos electrónicos: Nuevos dispositivos con nuevas enfermedadesWhile e-cigarettes are commonly used as a smoking cessation strategy, evidence is limited regarding their effectiveness as compared with other strategies such as approved nicotine products (chewing gum, candy, patches, etc.) that act as nicotine replacement to help patients stop smoking permanently.

 

A total of 886 participants attending dedicated U.K. stop-smoking services underwent randomization to either nicotine-replacement products (different combinations or presentations) for 3 months or an e-cigarette (a second-generation refillable e-cigarette with one bottle of nicotine e-liquid [18 mg/mL]). Flavor and strength were left to the patients’ choice. Treatment was to be followed for at least 4 weeks.


Read also: E-Cigarettes: No Definitive Evidence on Their Potential Cardiovascular Effect, but Some Suggest Caution.


For both treatment arms, treatment included counseling follow-up for at least 4 weeks.

 

The primary outcome was sustained abstinence for one year, which was validated biochemically at the final follow-up visit. Participants who were lost to follow-up or did not access biochemical validation were considered to not be abstinent.

 

The abstinence rate at one year was 18% in the e-cigarette group vs. 9.9% in the nicotine-replacement group (relative risk [RR]: 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30 to 2.58; p < 0.001). While the abstinence rate for e-cigarettes almost doubled the rate for nicotine-replacement therapy, 18% is still very low and we should insist so that more patients can quit smoking for good.


Read also: Several Features Define a Hostile Neck in AAA patients, but Only One Makes the Difference.


The most frequently reported events were throat or mouth irritation for the e-cigarette group and nausea for the nicotine-replacement group.

 

Symptoms such as cough and phlegm production were also minor in the e-cigarette group.

 

There were no differences between groups in the incidence of bronchospasm or dyspnea.

 

Conclusion

E-cigarettes were more effective for smoking cessation than nicotine-replacement therapy when both were accompanied by psychological and medical advice.

 

Original title: A Randomized Trial of E-Cigarettes Versus Nicotine-Replacement Therapy.

Reference: Peter Hajek et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):629-637.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...

OCT- and IVUS-Guided Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has reduced mortality in the acute phase. However, recurrent ACS and target vessel...

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...