EuroPCR 2019 | COAPT: Mitral Valve Reduction is Associated to Lower Hospitalization and Death

This new analysis shows the mechanism behind the benefit of using MitraClip and the necessary degree of residual mitral regurgitation (MR) to have an impact.

Regardless the intervention type, patients with cardiac failure and secondary mitral regurgitation present lower hospitalization for cardiac failure, all-cause mortality and improved quality of life the lower the MR.

MitraClip superiority to achieve and maintain MR reduction seems to be the mechanism behind the observed benefit in COAPT.

Whenever achieving 2+ MR is possible is when we start seeing results, and when comparing patients with 2+ residual MR vs. patients with 1+ residual MR there are no important differences in benefit.


Read also: Staged Complete Revascularization vs. Culprit Vessel PCI at Long-Term.


The 614 COAPT patients presented 3+ or 4+ MR at the start of the study. At 30 days, 73% of patients receiving MitraClip had 0/1+, close to 20% had 2+ and 7.4% had 3+ MR or more.

On the contrary, only 34.3% of patients treated strictly according to guidelines reached a 2+ reduction or more in the same period.

But while the MitraClip was superior than the best medical treatment at reducing MR, according to this study, it remains unclear why reduction with medical treatment has the same durability and prognostic impact.

Primary end point rate (time to first hospitalization for cardiac failure or all-cause death) was significantly higher for patients with residual MR 3+ or higher (73.5%) vs. those reaching 0/1+ (38.6%) or 2+ (49.8% p<0.001 for all comparisons) with no significant differences between the group 0/1+ vs 2+.

Read also: EuroPCR 2019 | CHOICE: Balloon-Expandable Valves vs. Self-Expanding Valves in High-Risk Patients.

As regards quality of life scores at 12 months, patients with residual MR 0/1+ or 2+ scored nearly twice as high as baseline values vs. patients with 3+ residual MR.

coapt-presentación-europcr

Original Title: Relationship between residual mitral regurgitation and clinical and functional outcomes in the COAPT trial.

Presenter: Kar S.

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...