Cardiovascular Risk, Dual Antiplatelet Therapy, and Age. What Should We Know?

Non-adherence to dual antiplatelet therapy varies with age and patients older than 75 years old are those who discontinue treatment most frequently. However, this characteristic in elderly patients was not associated with more cardiovascular events.

Doble antiagregación: menos es más en añosos.

Treatment compliance protected patients younger than 75 years old from events, while there was increased cardiovascular risk among this population when dual antiplatelet therapy was discontinued.

This work derives from the PARIS (Patterns of Non-Adherence to Antiplatelet Regimens in Stented Patients) registry, which analyzed clinical events at 2 years, incidence, and effect of dual antiplatelet therapy cessation by age (≤55, 56 to 74, and ≥75 years).

Dual antiplatelet therapy cessation included physician-recommended discontinuation, interruption for surgery, disruption from bleeding, and, finally, non-compliance.


Read also: Outpatient Rhythm Monitoring After TAVR Could Save Us from Some Pacemakers?


Clinical events were a composite of cardiac death, definite or probable stent thrombosis, spontaneous infarction, or clinically-justified revascularization. The secondary endpoints were bleeding and the primary endpoint excluding revascularization (MACE2).

A total of 1192 (24%) patients were ≤55 years old, 2869 (57%) were 56-74 years old, and 957 (19%) were ≥75 years old.

Patients who were ≥75 years old discontinued treatment more frequently and also presented increased risk of MACE2, death, cardiac death, and bleeding compared to younger patients.

Dual antiplatelet therapy cessation was only associated with an increased risk of events in younger patients (≤75 years old) and when the cause for cessation was bleeding or patient decision. The latter could not be proven for the group of elderly patients.


Read also: Mortality and Paclitaxel Devices, Data Are Aligning.


Cessation was not associated with events when caused by medical indication or surgery, regardless of the age group.

We may conclude that non-adherence (treatment cessation by choice) seems to be dangerous only in young patients or when caused by bleeding.

Original Title: Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation and Cardiovascular Risk in Relation to Age Analysis From the PARIS Registry.

Reference: Lauren C. Joyce et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019;12:983–92.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....