5-Year Experience of Appendage Closure: More Evidence that Does Not Translate into Clinical Practice

The use of percutaneous left appendage closure increased 3.6-fold from 2011 to 2015, but this volume increase did not entail a significant uptrend of in-hospital events in this “real-world” population in Germany. However, can Germany be considered a real-world setting for Latin America? This question is warranted by the fact that there is no apparent volume increase for this technique in our region, which may be due to its cost or the lack of referral from clinicians to interventional cardiologists.

Resultados a 5 años del cierre de orejuela

For Germans, the most important predictors of in-hospital mortality were acute renal failure, pericardial effusion, and peri-procedural ischemic stroke.

The safety and efficacy of percutaneous left appendage closure have been demonstrated in randomized trials and prospective cohort studies, but data from a large number of daily clinical practice patients (at least from Germany) are missing.

This study included and analyzed 15,895 patients between 2011 and 2015. The annual number of procedures went up from 1347, in 2011, to almost four times that number (4932), in 2015. This increase was very significant (p < 0.001).


Read also: Five-Year Outcomes for Appendage Closure.


Patient characteristics changed over time, towards older age and prevalence of comorbidities such as heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic renal insufficiency.

The most important independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were cancer (odds ratio [OR]: 2.49), heart failure (OR: 2.42), stroke (OR: 5.39), acute renal failure (OR: 13.28), pericardial effusion (OR: 5.65), and shock (OR: 45.11). The presence of acute renal failure in relation to this procedure, which uses very little contrast, is of note, while the increased mortality among patients with shock is absolutely unsurprising (even though none of us would even dream of conducting an appendage closure in such a setting).

Conclusion

The use of left appendage closure increased 3.6-fold from 2011 to 2015, with a nonsignificant uptrend of mortality. This was all in a setting where treated patients were significantly more ill. The most important predictors of in-hospital mortality were acute renal failure, pericardial effusion, and peri-procedural stroke.

Original title: 5-Year Experience of In-HospitalOutcomes After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Germany.

Reference: Lukas Hobohm et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019;12:1044–52.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...