After Much Toing and Froing, Gastrointestinal Protection Is Back to the Forefront

Several clinical guidelines differ in their recommendation regarding the prescription of proton pump inhibitors to patients being treated with dual antiplatelet therapy after infarction. In 2015, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommended their use in patients with high bleeding risk; however, in the 2017 update that recommendation became general after the assumption that, for all patients, the benefit outweighs the risk.

¿Se justifica utilizar filtro de protección distal en los puentes venosos?

What would that risk be? Several studies proved an alteration in the pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel in patients who received proton pump inhibitors, but that never translated into clinical events.

Two things are clear: on the one hand, dual antiplatelet therapy reduces cardiovascular events after infarction; on the other, it increases the risk of bleeding.

Another thing is also clear: recurrent ischemic events and bleeding increase the mortality rate. However, the net clinical benefit favors use, particularly after acute myocardial infarction.


Read also: We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.


The Clopidogrel and the Optimization of Gastrointestinal Events study showed that the use of proton pump inhibitors effectively reduces gastrointestinal bleeding, but the number of patients in this study with prior infarction was low, and the study only used aspirin + clopidogrel. Our knowledge of more powerful inhibitors such as prasugrel and ticagrelor is even more limited.

This study assessed 46,301 patients with dual antiplatelet therapy after acute myocardial infarction. Only 35% of patients (only those with higher risk of bleeding) were discharged with gastrointestinal protection.

At 1 year, the rate of upper gastrointestinal bleeding was 1% for the general population and 1.7% for high-risk patients.


Read also: Improved Outcomes after Lower Limb Revascularization.


Globally, proton pump inhibitors were associated with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.62 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.48 to 0.77), corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 0.44%. The RR for high-risk patients was similar to that of the general population: 0.47%.

Conclusion

Proton pump inhibitors are used less than recommended by clinical practice guidelines in Europe for patients who receive dual antiplatelet therapy after acute myocardial infarction. They effectively reduce the rate of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Considering that the risk of bleeding is generally low, we should focus more on the identification of the patients who might benefit the most.

Original Title: Reduced risk of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy after myocardial infarction.

Reference: Thomas S.G. Sehested et al. European Heart Journal (2019) 00, 1–8. Article in press


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Su opinión nos interesa. Puede dejar su comentario, reflexión, pregunta o lo que desee aquí abajo. Será más que bienvenido.

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...