ESC 2019 | MITRA-FR: 2-Year Outcomes of One of the Largest Studies on MitraClip

Negative one-year outcomes of Mitra-FR led to several discussions and hypothesis, especially after the COAPT was published only a few weeks later. According to the COAPT study, the MitraClip was able to reduce hospitalization rate for cardiac failure and also all-cause mortality, compared against optimal medical treatment alone. When comparing the COAPT to the Mitra-FR, contrasting outcomes were explained by the shorter follow-up of the latter, and therefore better outcomes were expected from a longer follow-up period.

Unfortunately, Mitra-FR 2-year outcomes, presented on Monday, have confirmed those first results. The composite of all cause death and unplanned hospitalization for cardiac failure was similar between the groups (64.2% for the MitraClip vs 68.6% for the group receiving optimal medical treatment alone).

All-cause mortality was 34.9% for the MitraClip and 34.2% for the control group (HR 1.02; CI 95% 0.70 to 1.50), and unplanned hospitalization rate for cardiac failure was 55.9% for MitraClip and 61.8% for the control group (HR 0.97; CI 95% 0.72 to 1.30). There was a trend in favor of the intervention group that did not reach statistical significance.


Read also: ESC 2019 | DAPA-HF: Dapagliflozin Shows Benefit for All Subgroups.


These results confirm the initial results of Mitra-FR and perhaps we should think the difference with the COAPT outcomes lies on population characteristics rather than follow-up period.

It seems obvious that we need further research on percutaneous repair of secondary mitral regurgitation to be able to better identify what patients will really benefit.

Original title: 2-year follow-up of the MITRA-FR study: effectiveness of percutaneous mitral valve repair in secondary mitral regurgitation.

Reference: Presentado por Jean-François Obadia en el ESC 2019. Paris, Francia.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...