Thin, Very Thin, and Ultrathin Struts, with Permanent or Biodegradable Polymer… Which Is the Best Combination?

Results from the BIO-RESORT trial at three years, soon to be published in JACC Intv., show that, despite significant differences among stents as regards strut thickness and capability to reabsorb the polymer, there are no apparent safety or efficacy differences among devices.

The aim of this study was to determine the three-year safety and efficacy of three different contemporary drug-eluting stents in a real-world population.

The BIO-RESORT (Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer and Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in an All Comers Population) trial randomized 3514 patients to an ultrathin-strut cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stent (Orsiro) vs. a very-thin-strut platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (Synergy) vs. a durable-polymer thin-strut cobalt-chromium zotarolimus-eluting stent (Resolute Integrity).

The one-year follow-up showed similar results for the two biodegradable-polymer devices and the durable-polymer stent. At two years, there seemed to be an advantage in favor of the sirolimus-eluting stent (Orsiro) in terms of repeat revascularization.


Read also: Is Complete Revascularization the Right Choice in Acute Myocardial Infarction with Multivessel Disease?


Ultimately, at 3 years, the safety and efficacy of these devices turned out to be similar.

At the end of the follow-up period, target vessel revascularization occurred in 8.5% with Orsiro, in 10.0% with Resolute Integrity, and in 8.8% with Synergy. These differences were all non-significant.

Rates of cardiac death, target vessel infarction, and target vessel revascularization (the combined primary safety and efficacy endpoint) were similar among the 3 stents. Secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary endpoint and the definite or probable stent thrombosis rate (1.1% for everolimus; 1.1% for sirolimus; 0.9% for zotarolimus).

Conclusion

Despite substantial differences in strut thickness, alloy, polymer coating, and drug delivered, there were no significant differences in any endpoint (combined or individual) among these three contemporary stents at three years. Further follow-up may show separation for one of these curves; so far, there is nothing new under the sun.

Original Title: Thin, Very Thin, or Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable- or Durable-Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents. 3-Year Outcomes of BIO-RESORT.

Reference: Rosaly A. Buiten et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019; Article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...