Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

TCT 2019 | PARTNER 2A at 5 Years: In Intermediate-Risk Patients, TAVR Is Still Head-to-Head with Surgery

Courtesy of the SBHCI.

The 2-year results of the PARTNER 2A trial showed that transcatheter aortic valve implantation has a result similar to that of surgery in patients with aortic stenosis and intermediate surgical risk. We lacked long-term data, both clinical and related to prosthesis function.

Highlights TCT 2019

Now, at TCT 2019, researchers presented the 5-year data for this work, information long awaited by interventional cardiologists.

The PARTNER 2A trial randomized 2032 patients with severe aortic stenosis and intermediate surgical risk to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical replacement in 57 sites between 2011 and 2013. Patients were eligible for transfemoral access (n = 1550) or transapical/transaortic access (n = 482). The primary endpoints analyzed were all-cause death or stroke, and the analysis also included echocardiography results, so as to count with durability data.


Read also: TCT 2019 | Mitral Valve-in-Valve: 1-Year Results for Sapien 3 in Mitral Valve Replacement for Degenerated Bioprostheses.


At 5 years, death and stroke were 47.9% in the TAVR group and 43.4 % in the surgery group (p = 0.21).

For patients who received the prosthesis through transfemoral access, there were no differences at 5 years (44.5% vs. 42%; p = 0.8); however, in patients who required transapical/transaortic access, surgery had better outcomes (59.3% for TAVR vs. 48.3% for surgery; p = 0.03).

At 5 years from implantation or surgery, over 95% of patients in both groups were free of aortic valve reintervention, with an advantage favoring surgery (99.4% vs. 96.8%).

The gradients for bioprostheses at 30 days, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were similar for both strategies (around 10 mmHg). It was different for aortic regurgitation, with an advantage in favor of surgery (33.3% vs. 6.3%; p < 0.001). The severity of aortic regurgitation was related with all-cause death, which occurred in 64.8% of patients with moderate or severe regurgitation, 48.7% of patients with mild regurgitation, and 41.1% of patients with no regurgitation (p < 0.001).

Courtesy of the SBHCI.

Original title: Outcomes from a Randomized Trial of Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Presenter: Vinod H. Thourani.

Link to the SBHCI publication AQUÍ

partner-2

Original title: PARTNER 2A – 5-Year: Outcomes From A Randomized Trial Of Transcatheter Vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement In Intermediate-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Author of the original article: Vinod H. Thourani.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...