Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Peripheral Vascular Disease

Everybody keeps wondering whether drug-coated balloons can actually increase mortality. If that is the case, there is an even harder question in need of an answer: what would be the physiopathology for such increase in mortality?

Seguridad de los balones con paclitaxel en enfermedad vascular periférica

As a lukewarm message, the US Food and Drug Administration recommended a special informed consent form when these devices are used, but nothing more definitive.

The last systematic review and meta-analysis, which included works that were rather uneven, showed an increase in mortality for patients who received paclitaxel-eluting stents or balloons in peripheral disease.

This work, which will be published in J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. in the next days, brings us some more information and peace of mind about paclitaxel devices.


Read also: New FDA Updates on Paclitaxel Device Outcomes.


Researchers evaluated 1093 patients who underwent paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty and 250 patients who underwent conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of the femoropopliteal artery, included in the LEVANT 1 (The Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Prevention of Femoropopliteal Restenosis) trial, the LEVANT 2 (Moxy Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arteries) trial, and the LEVANT Japan Clinical Trial.

There were no significant differences as regards mortality between study arms. At 5 years, the risk was 1.01 (95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 1.52) considering the LEVANT trials as a whole.

Adverse events and causes of death were well balanced, and there was no trend towards a specific cause of death.

Variables predicting mortality included, among others, age, prior treatment of target lesion, arrhythmia, and diabetes, without differences between the two arms.


Read also: The FDA Affirms Mortality Signs with Paclitaxel Based Devices.


There was no association between drug dose and effect after adjustment for all predictors.

Conclusion

The analysis of all patients participating in the LEVANT trials with paclitaxel-coated balloon Lutonix showed no significant differences in mortality as regards patients who received conventional balloons.

Original title: Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease.

Reference: Kenneth Ouriel et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019, online before print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

Safety of Prophylactic Spinal Fluid Drainage in Open and Endovascular Repair of Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Spinal cord injury remains one of the most devastating complications of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, mainly associated to a compromised the Adamkiewicz artery...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....