Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Peripheral Vascular Disease

Everybody keeps wondering whether drug-coated balloons can actually increase mortality. If that is the case, there is an even harder question in need of an answer: what would be the physiopathology for such increase in mortality?

Seguridad de los balones con paclitaxel en enfermedad vascular periférica

As a lukewarm message, the US Food and Drug Administration recommended a special informed consent form when these devices are used, but nothing more definitive.

The last systematic review and meta-analysis, which included works that were rather uneven, showed an increase in mortality for patients who received paclitaxel-eluting stents or balloons in peripheral disease.

This work, which will be published in J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. in the next days, brings us some more information and peace of mind about paclitaxel devices.


Read also: New FDA Updates on Paclitaxel Device Outcomes.


Researchers evaluated 1093 patients who underwent paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty and 250 patients who underwent conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of the femoropopliteal artery, included in the LEVANT 1 (The Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Prevention of Femoropopliteal Restenosis) trial, the LEVANT 2 (Moxy Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arteries) trial, and the LEVANT Japan Clinical Trial.

There were no significant differences as regards mortality between study arms. At 5 years, the risk was 1.01 (95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 1.52) considering the LEVANT trials as a whole.

Adverse events and causes of death were well balanced, and there was no trend towards a specific cause of death.

Variables predicting mortality included, among others, age, prior treatment of target lesion, arrhythmia, and diabetes, without differences between the two arms.


Read also: The FDA Affirms Mortality Signs with Paclitaxel Based Devices.


There was no association between drug dose and effect after adjustment for all predictors.

Conclusion

The analysis of all patients participating in the LEVANT trials with paclitaxel-coated balloon Lutonix showed no significant differences in mortality as regards patients who received conventional balloons.

Original title: Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease.

Reference: Kenneth Ouriel et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019, online before print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Treatment Outcomes According to a Worldwide Registry

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a highly limiting condition that, despite its moderate incidence, significantly impacts patient prognosis and quality of life. The...

Contemporary Outcomes of Acute Limb Ischemia Endovascular Revascularization

Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a vascular emergency with high mortality rate. It has been defined as a sudden occlusion of limb perfusion compromising...

TCT 2024 | SIRONA: Randomized Study Comparing Sirolimus-Coated vs Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Femoropopliteal Disease

This prospective, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated non-inferiority study compared the use of sirolimus-coated balloon (MagicTouch) vs paclitaxel-coated balloon in endovascular treatment.  The primary objective was to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...