Vitamin D Supplements for the Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease

A supplement (or anything, really) that might reduce simultaneously the risk of cardiovascular disease and of cancer would be truly revolutionary. This work, published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), sought to prove that vitamin D supplements might reduce the risk for both pathologies (the two most frequent diseases in the world). However, the incidence of cancer and cardiovascular disease with this therapy did not differ from their incidence with a placebo.

This placebo-controlled trial, with a two-by-two factorial design, randomized subjects to vitamin D (cholecalciferol) at a dose of 2000 IU per day and omega-3 fatty acids at a dose of 1 g per day, or a placebo, for the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease in men over 50 years of age and women over 55 years of age.

Primary endpoints were invasive cancer of any type and major cardiovascular events (a composite of infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death). Secondary endpoints included type-specific cancers, death from cancer, and other cardiovascular events.

This article reports the results of vitamin D vs. placebo.


Read also: Dietary Supplements and Diets Show No Impact on Cardiovascular Risk.


In a total of 25,871 randomized participants, there was no reduction in the risk of either of the primary endpoints.

During a follow-up of 5.3 years, 1617 participants were diagnosed with cancer (793 in the vitamin D group and 824 in the placebo group). This difference is non-significant (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 1.06; p = 0.47).

Major cardiovascular events occurred in 805 participants (396 in the vitamin D group and 409 in the placebo group). This difference is also non-significant (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.12; p = 0.69).


Read also: Cardiovascular Risk, Dual Antiplatelet Therapy, and Age. What Should We Know?


Results for the secondary endpoints were non-significant either for breast cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, and the expanded cardiovascular endpoint that included coronary revascularization.

While there were no benefits, no increased risks of hypercalcemia or other adverse events were identified either.

Conclusion

Vitamin D supplements did not result in a lower incidence of cancer or cardiovascular disease compared with placebo.

2020-01-15-manson2019

Original title: Vitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease. The VITAL Research Group.

Reference: JoAnn E. Manson et al. N Engl J Med 380 (1), 33-44 2019 Jan 3.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....