New European Guidelines for Dyslipidemia Management: What is New?

Reading clinical practice guidelines, except for specific consultation, is usually tedious. These guidelines are nor meant to be read as a textbook, or at least this is what most readers believe. 

Nuevas Guías Europeas de Dislipemia

But it looks like this reader’s perception has finally been acknowledged, hence “table 3” in the new European dyslipidemia guidelines, where the new recommendations, the amends to the 2016 recommendations, the new sections and the new, or recently revised concepts, are enumerated. A perfect summary to refresh and update all we already knew. 

New recommendations:

  • Check arterial plaque volume (carotid or femoral) by ECG, to eventually modify the risk of a particular patient, especially those at low or moderate risk. 

  • Calcium score by CT can also be considered for “conventional” risk reassessment in asymptomatic individuals at low or moderate risk. 

  • Measure, even though just once, Lp(a) value to identify patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (values over 180 mg/dl or > 430 nmol/L).

  • In high risk patients with triglycerides between 135 and 499 mg/dl, consider treating with omega 3 in addition to statins. With even higher values, we should treat the risk of pancreatitis.
  • In patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in primary prevention, consider reducing baseline LDL levels beyond 50% or an absolute value <55 mg/dl.
  • Statin treatments are recommended in primary prevention according to risk levels in elderly patients younger than 75.

  • Statin treatments in primary prevention in patients over 75 could be considered, especially with high baseline risk. 

  • In type 2 diabetic patients at very high risk, the guidelines recommend reducing LDL baseline levels ≥ 50% or an absolute value <55 mg/dl. In case of less extreme risk, they recommend < 70 mg/dl. Upon failure to meet the target values, we should consider combining statins with ezetimibe.

  • Statins are NOT recommended in premenopausal diabetic patients who are considering pregnancy or are not using adequate contraception. 

  • For patients with ongoing acute coronary syndrome who fail to meet LDL targets despite being treated with the highest tolerated statin dose, we should consider adding a PCSK9 inhibitor (if possible, upon admission).


Read also: AHA 2018 | New Dyslipidemia Guidelines Support Non-Statin Therapy and Coronary Artery Calcium Screening.


The revised concepts include:

  • More intensive LDL reduction in secondary prevention. For those that have already presented an event and are at high risk, they recommend < 55 mg/dl. For those experiencing a second vascular event within 2 years of the first (regardless the territory) and are already taking the highest tolerated statin dose, they recommend considering a < 40 mg/dl LDL target.

  • In primary prevention, targets were also intensified. For very high-risk patients with no history of events presenting a new event, they recommend reducing LDL baseline levels beyond 50% or < 55 mg/dl. For patients at high risk, they recommend reducing baseline levels beyond 50% or an absolute value lower than 70 mg/dl. If there is moderate risk in primary prevention, an LDL value lower than 100 mg/dl seems enough. For low risk patients, the cutoff value is lower than 116 mg/dl.

Read also: FFR in the Time of ISCHEMIA.


Another one of the points these guidelines emphasize was differentiating myopathy by statins from the so-called muscle symptoms associated to statins. 

2020-01-30-ehz455

Original Title: 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. The Task Force for the management of dyslipidemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).

Reference: European Heart Journal (2020) 41, 111-188.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....