New European Guidelines for Dyslipidemia Management: What is New?

Reading clinical practice guidelines, except for specific consultation, is usually tedious. These guidelines are nor meant to be read as a textbook, or at least this is what most readers believe. 

Nuevas Guías Europeas de Dislipemia

But it looks like this reader’s perception has finally been acknowledged, hence “table 3” in the new European dyslipidemia guidelines, where the new recommendations, the amends to the 2016 recommendations, the new sections and the new, or recently revised concepts, are enumerated. A perfect summary to refresh and update all we already knew. 

New recommendations:

  • Check arterial plaque volume (carotid or femoral) by ECG, to eventually modify the risk of a particular patient, especially those at low or moderate risk. 

  • Calcium score by CT can also be considered for “conventional” risk reassessment in asymptomatic individuals at low or moderate risk. 

  • Measure, even though just once, Lp(a) value to identify patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (values over 180 mg/dl or > 430 nmol/L).

  • In high risk patients with triglycerides between 135 and 499 mg/dl, consider treating with omega 3 in addition to statins. With even higher values, we should treat the risk of pancreatitis.
  • In patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in primary prevention, consider reducing baseline LDL levels beyond 50% or an absolute value <55 mg/dl.
  • Statin treatments are recommended in primary prevention according to risk levels in elderly patients younger than 75.

  • Statin treatments in primary prevention in patients over 75 could be considered, especially with high baseline risk. 

  • In type 2 diabetic patients at very high risk, the guidelines recommend reducing LDL baseline levels ≥ 50% or an absolute value <55 mg/dl. In case of less extreme risk, they recommend < 70 mg/dl. Upon failure to meet the target values, we should consider combining statins with ezetimibe.

  • Statins are NOT recommended in premenopausal diabetic patients who are considering pregnancy or are not using adequate contraception. 

  • For patients with ongoing acute coronary syndrome who fail to meet LDL targets despite being treated with the highest tolerated statin dose, we should consider adding a PCSK9 inhibitor (if possible, upon admission).


Read also: AHA 2018 | New Dyslipidemia Guidelines Support Non-Statin Therapy and Coronary Artery Calcium Screening.


The revised concepts include:

  • More intensive LDL reduction in secondary prevention. For those that have already presented an event and are at high risk, they recommend < 55 mg/dl. For those experiencing a second vascular event within 2 years of the first (regardless the territory) and are already taking the highest tolerated statin dose, they recommend considering a < 40 mg/dl LDL target.

  • In primary prevention, targets were also intensified. For very high-risk patients with no history of events presenting a new event, they recommend reducing LDL baseline levels beyond 50% or < 55 mg/dl. For patients at high risk, they recommend reducing baseline levels beyond 50% or an absolute value lower than 70 mg/dl. If there is moderate risk in primary prevention, an LDL value lower than 100 mg/dl seems enough. For low risk patients, the cutoff value is lower than 116 mg/dl.

Read also: FFR in the Time of ISCHEMIA.


Another one of the points these guidelines emphasize was differentiating myopathy by statins from the so-called muscle symptoms associated to statins. 

2020-01-30-ehz455

Original Title: 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. The Task Force for the management of dyslipidemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).

Reference: European Heart Journal (2020) 41, 111-188.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | VANISH2 Trial

Cardiac defibrillator implants (CDIs) have been shown to improve survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, approximately one third of...

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...