TAVR in Extremely Large Annuli: Different Patients Might Need Different Prostheses

Nearly all prostheses for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) commercially available at present are adequate for most patients. However, there are certain subgroups, relatively small, that could benefit from a particular one. Yesterday we went over the best suited for small annuli, which turned out to be the self-expandable in general and the Evolut PRO in particular. Today we are reviewing a study that included the opposite population: patients presenting extremely large annuli. 

TAVI en anillos gigantes

The study included 105 patients with large annuli (mean annulus area 721.3 ± 36.1 mm2) from 15 centers undergoing TAVR with balloon expandable S3 between 2013 and 2018.

Mean age of patients was 76.9 ± 10.4 and the predicted surgical risk by STS was 5.2 ± 3.4%. 

At one year, global mortality and stroke rates were 18.2% and 2.4%, respectively. Baseline quality of life improved significantly at 30 days and one year (p<0.0001 for both).


Read also: TAVR in Small Annuli: Is There a Better Valve?


There was mild paravalvular regurgitation in 21.7% while moderate to greater occurred in 4.3% of patients. Gradients remained stable at one year. 

The last model of balloon expandable valves S3 seems more appropriate in patients with extremely large annuli, even though, as we concluded yesterday, more randomized studies are necessary for us to be able to determine what patients will benefit more from either of them.

Conclusion

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with extremely large annuli is feasible with S3, with favorable clinical and electrocardiographic results at mid-term. 

Original Title: Mid-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Extremely Large Annuli With Edwards SAPIEN 3 Valve.

Reference: Aditya Sengupta et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019, article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....