ESC 2020 | Antihypertensive Therapy Reduces Events Regardless of BP Levels or Risk

Antihypertensive therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular events even in patients with no history of heart disease or with normal baseline blood pressure (BP).

This fuels a long-running debate about thresholds for hypertension diagnosis (which may or may not exist). Beyond that, the higher the baseline BP, the better the benefit.

The decision to prescribe antihypertensive medication should not be based simply on a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease or the blood pressure level recorded. Treatment seems to benefit all patients, regardless of those parameters.

According to the main investigator for this study, Dr. Kazem Rahimi, these agents should not be called ‘antihypertensive’ anymore and become ‘risk-modifying’ medications.

As thresholds to consider a patient as hypertensive, European guidelines recommend systolic BPs over 140 mmHg, while US guidelines lower the mark to 130 mmHg.


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | More Evidence in Support of the Demanding 2017 Hypertension Guidelines.


Recommendations also differ in terms of patient age, comorbidities, and background required to start treatment. 

This work, Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration (BPLTTC), analyzed 348,854 patients from 48 randomized clinical trials. Patients were grouped according to prior diagnosis of cardiovascular disease and then stratified in 7 blood pressure levels (from <120 mmHg up to >170 mmHg).

For every 5-mmHg reduction in blood pressure due to antihypertensive treatment, there was a benefit over 5 years of follow-up. Presence or absence of cardiovascular disease did not modify such benefit in relative terms, and neither did the baseline blood pressure level.


Read also: New European Hypertension Guidelines Contrast with American Recommendations.


This study shows that the benefit of antihypertensive treatment is proportional to the intensity of systolic blood pressure reduction. The greater the reduction, the greater the benefit.

Each 5-mmHg reduction of systolic blood pressure reduces the risk of major cardiovascular events by 10%, stroke by 13%, heart failure by 14%, ischemic heart disease by 7%, and, finally, cardiovascular death by 5%. This 5-mmHg reduction benefited even patients with <120-mmHg systolic blood pressure at baseline.

There may be some differences depending on the type of antihypertensive drug. Calcium channel blockers may be less effective for the prevention of heart failure but more effective in the reduction of stroke events. The reverse might be true for diuretics.


Read also: What to Do with Blood Pressure Levels Between 130/80 and 139/89 mmHg.


There is another discussion regarding absolute benefit. If the patient is very young, with no comorbidities or cardiovascular risk factors, the absolute benefit obtained will be very low and will have to be considered against possible drug side effects and costs.

Original Title: Pharmacological blood pressure-lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure.

Reference: Rahimi K. Presentado en forma virtual en el congreso ESC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After Complex PCI in ACS: Results From the NEO-MINDSET COMPLEX Subanalysis

This is a summary of the NEO-MINDSET COMPLEX subanalysis, presented by Dr. Guy Prado at EuroPCR 2026, which evaluated P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy versus dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | Evolocumab Reduces Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior PCI Without Previous Myocardial Infarction: VESALIUS-CV Results

This presentation, delivered by Dr. Brian A. Bergmark and colleagues at EuroPCR 2026, detailed the results of the VESALIUS-CV trial, focusing specifically on the...

EuroPCR 2026 | Is It Safe to Stop Aspirin After One Month in MI Patients Undergoing PCI? TARGET-FIRST Analysis

This is a summary of the post-hoc analysis of the TARGET-FIRST study, presented by Dr. Giuseppe Tarantini at EuroPCR 2026, evaluating early aspirin discontinuation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

Drug-Eluting Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: When Should They Be Used?

Peripheral drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of peripheral arterial disease by reducing restenosis rates and the need for repeat interventions. However, the emergence...