Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

ESC 2020 | Antihypertensive Therapy Reduces Events Regardless of BP Levels or Risk

Antihypertensive therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular events even in patients with no history of heart disease or with normal baseline blood pressure (BP).

This fuels a long-running debate about thresholds for hypertension diagnosis (which may or may not exist). Beyond that, the higher the baseline BP, the better the benefit.

The decision to prescribe antihypertensive medication should not be based simply on a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease or the blood pressure level recorded. Treatment seems to benefit all patients, regardless of those parameters.

According to the main investigator for this study, Dr. Kazem Rahimi, these agents should not be called ‘antihypertensive’ anymore and become ‘risk-modifying’ medications.

As thresholds to consider a patient as hypertensive, European guidelines recommend systolic BPs over 140 mmHg, while US guidelines lower the mark to 130 mmHg.


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | More Evidence in Support of the Demanding 2017 Hypertension Guidelines.


Recommendations also differ in terms of patient age, comorbidities, and background required to start treatment. 

This work, Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration (BPLTTC), analyzed 348,854 patients from 48 randomized clinical trials. Patients were grouped according to prior diagnosis of cardiovascular disease and then stratified in 7 blood pressure levels (from <120 mmHg up to >170 mmHg).

For every 5-mmHg reduction in blood pressure due to antihypertensive treatment, there was a benefit over 5 years of follow-up. Presence or absence of cardiovascular disease did not modify such benefit in relative terms, and neither did the baseline blood pressure level.


Read also: New European Hypertension Guidelines Contrast with American Recommendations.


This study shows that the benefit of antihypertensive treatment is proportional to the intensity of systolic blood pressure reduction. The greater the reduction, the greater the benefit.

Each 5-mmHg reduction of systolic blood pressure reduces the risk of major cardiovascular events by 10%, stroke by 13%, heart failure by 14%, ischemic heart disease by 7%, and, finally, cardiovascular death by 5%. This 5-mmHg reduction benefited even patients with <120-mmHg systolic blood pressure at baseline.

There may be some differences depending on the type of antihypertensive drug. Calcium channel blockers may be less effective for the prevention of heart failure but more effective in the reduction of stroke events. The reverse might be true for diuretics.


Read also: What to Do with Blood Pressure Levels Between 130/80 and 139/89 mmHg.


There is another discussion regarding absolute benefit. If the patient is very young, with no comorbidities or cardiovascular risk factors, the absolute benefit obtained will be very low and will have to be considered against possible drug side effects and costs.

Original Title: Pharmacological blood pressure-lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure.

Reference: Rahimi K. Presentado en forma virtual en el congreso ESC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SCAI 2026 | Deep vein arterialization as an alternative in patients with critical limb ischemia without conventional options

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents one of the most advanced stages of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In a significant proportion of patients, distal anatomy,...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

SCAI 2026 | SELUTION DeNovo subanalysis: Use of sirolimus-eluting balloon in acute coronary syndrome

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains the predominant strategy in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, in recent...