Conscious Versus General Anesthesia in TAVR

Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can safely undergo the procedure under conscious sedation.

Sedación consciente vs anestesia general en el TAVI

Conscious sedation has been adopted in clinical practice as a natural way of simplifying and conducting the procedure in the least invasive way possible.

Currently, up to 50% of patients undergo TAVR under conscious sedation, but so far there was no randomized evidence on the matter.

SOLVE-TAVI was a multicenter, open-label, 2×2 factorial, randomized trial of 447 patients with aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR, comparing conscious sedation vs. general anesthesia.

The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite powered for equivalence between both strategies for anesthesia. The composite endpoint at 30 days included: all-cause mortality, stroke, infarction, infection requiring antibiotic treatment, and acute kidney injury.


Read also: FFR and iFR Discordance in up to 20% of Cases: Which One Should Inform Our Decisions?


The primary endpoint occurred in 27.2% of patients in the conscious sedation arm vs. 26.4% of patients in the general anesthesia arm (p for equivalence = 0.015).

The rates of individual components also reached significance for equivalence. All-cause mortality was 3.2% for conscious sedation vs. 2.3% for general anesthesia; as regards stroke, 2.4% vs. 2.8%; infarction, 0.5% vs. 0%; infection requiring antibiotic treatment, 21.1% vs. 22%, and acute kidney injury, 9% vs. 9.2%, respectively.

There was a lower need for inotropes or vasopressors in patients who received conscious sedation (62.8% vs. 97.3%).

Conclusion

Conscious sedation had similar results in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVR compared with general anesthesia. These findings suggest that conscious sedation may be used safely during the procedure.

10-1161-circulationaha-120-046451

Original Title: General versus Local Anesthesia with Conscious Sedation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The Randomized SOLVE-TAVI Trial.

Reference: Holger Thiele et al. Circulation. 2020 Oct 13;142(15):1437-1447. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046451.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TAVR in Bicuspid Valves: Higher Prosthesis Mismatch?

TAVR indication is steadily advancing onto younger, lower risk patients.  The presence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) has been observed in 0.5% to 2% of...

Edge-to-Edge Repair in Central and Non-Central Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common condition, with approximately 3.5% prevalence in individuals under 65, increasing to 7.7% in those over 75. It can...

Is Angioplasty Always Necessary after TAVR?

Courtesy of: Silvina E. Gomez, MD The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing TAVR is high, ranging from 40 to 70%, according...

TAVR and Anticoagulation: What Should We Do?

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has consolidated as a valid strategy for certain groups of patients. However, approximately one third of those who require...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TAVR in Bicuspid Valves: Higher Prosthesis Mismatch?

TAVR indication is steadily advancing onto younger, lower risk patients.  The presence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) has been observed in 0.5% to 2% of...

ROLLER COASTR-EPIC22: Comparison of Plaque Modification Techniques in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

The presence of coronary calcium significantly limits the success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), primarily due to suboptimal stent expansion. This can lead to...

Edge-to-Edge Repair in Central and Non-Central Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common condition, with approximately 3.5% prevalence in individuals under 65, increasing to 7.7% in those over 75. It can...