Conscious Versus General Anesthesia in TAVR

Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can safely undergo the procedure under conscious sedation.

Sedación consciente vs anestesia general en el TAVI

Conscious sedation has been adopted in clinical practice as a natural way of simplifying and conducting the procedure in the least invasive way possible.

Currently, up to 50% of patients undergo TAVR under conscious sedation, but so far there was no randomized evidence on the matter.

SOLVE-TAVI was a multicenter, open-label, 2×2 factorial, randomized trial of 447 patients with aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR, comparing conscious sedation vs. general anesthesia.

The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite powered for equivalence between both strategies for anesthesia. The composite endpoint at 30 days included: all-cause mortality, stroke, infarction, infection requiring antibiotic treatment, and acute kidney injury.


Read also: FFR and iFR Discordance in up to 20% of Cases: Which One Should Inform Our Decisions?


The primary endpoint occurred in 27.2% of patients in the conscious sedation arm vs. 26.4% of patients in the general anesthesia arm (p for equivalence = 0.015).

The rates of individual components also reached significance for equivalence. All-cause mortality was 3.2% for conscious sedation vs. 2.3% for general anesthesia; as regards stroke, 2.4% vs. 2.8%; infarction, 0.5% vs. 0%; infection requiring antibiotic treatment, 21.1% vs. 22%, and acute kidney injury, 9% vs. 9.2%, respectively.

There was a lower need for inotropes or vasopressors in patients who received conscious sedation (62.8% vs. 97.3%).

Conclusion

Conscious sedation had similar results in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVR compared with general anesthesia. These findings suggest that conscious sedation may be used safely during the procedure.

Original Title: General versus Local Anesthesia with Conscious Sedation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The Randomized SOLVE-TAVI Trial.

Reference: Holger Thiele et al. Circulation. 2020 Oct 13;142(15):1437-1447. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046451.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...