Suture-Based Percutaneous Closure vs. Plug for Large Arteriotomies

This research was designed to test the superiority of plug-based vs. suture-based vascular closure devices in large arteriotomies, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Cierre con sutura o plug

Vascular complications from TAVR are relevant and, in many cases, derive from problems with the closure device.

The MASH (MANTA vs. Suture-based vascular closure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement) study was conducted in two centers, where patients undergoing TAVR were randomized to the MANTA device vs. 2 ProGlides.

The primary endpoint was a composite of major and minor access-related complications. The secondary endpoint included clinically relevant access-site bleeding, time to hemostasis, and device failure (not achieving hemostasis within 5 minutes or requiring an additional maneuver, such as stenting, surgery, or another device).

Between 2018 and 2020, 210 patients were enrolled (mean age: 81; mean STS: 2.7%).


Read also: Should We Discontinue Anticoagulation Before TAVR?


There were no differences in vascular complications between MANTA and ProGlide (10% vs. 4%; p = 0.16). Furthermore, clinically relevant bleeding rates were similar (9% vs. 6%, respectively, p = 0.57).

Device failure was less frequent with the MANTA device (20% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). To fix that issue, MANTA usually required surgery or a covered stent, while ProGlide could frequently solve the vascular complication with an additional closure device.

Conclusion

The plug-based vascular percutaneous closure device was similar in terms of vascular complications and bleeding compared with a suture-based device.

Device failure was lower with MANTA, but rescue maneuvers when needed were different that those required by the ProGlide.

Original title: Suture- or Plug-Based Large-Bore Arteriotomy Closure. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Reference: Maarten P. van Wiechen et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2021, article in press.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.052.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

Prospective Analysis of the Feasibility of the PASCAL System for Transcatheter Mitral Repair: OneForAll Registry

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is an effective option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation who are at high...

Left Bundle Branch Block after TAVR: What Is Its Impact?

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), which can be either...

Multicenter Experience with 3D Intracardiac Echocardiography for Guiding Interventional Cardiac Procedures

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Imaging techniques play a fundamental role in interventional cardiac procedures. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) appears as an alternative to transesophageal...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...