AAS vs Warfarin in Low Risk TAVR

We are still discussing the adequate antithrombotic scheme after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Additionally, we are treating a much wider array of patients ranging from low risk to inoperable. 

AAS vs Warfarina en TAVI de bajo riesgo

And there is yet one more important point: hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening diagnosed by CT. We are still unaware of the impact they have on device durability at long term, which is overly concerning in low-risk patients.  

This study recently published in Circ Cardiovasc Interv has tried to answer some of the questions above. The study openly randomized 1:1 low risk patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR to low-dose aspirin or warfarin plus low-dose aspirin for 30 days. 

It used CT or transesophageal echocardiography after one month to assess the presence of hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening, reduced leaflet motion, mean gradient ≥20 mm Hg, effective orifice area ≤1.0 cm2, moderate or severe regurgitation, stroke, or transient ischemic attack.


Read also: Medical Therapy Optimization Achieved Prior Clinical Trial.


50 patients received aspirin and 44 warfarin plus aspirin, and 30 who could not be randomized were enrolled into a registry.

The primary end point occurred in 26.5% of patients receiving aspirin vs. 7% of patient receiving aspirin and warfarin (p=0.014; OR 4.8). The difference was based on hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening rate (16.3% vs 4.8%; p=0.07).

There was no excess bleeding with warfarin during the first 30 days. 

Conclusion

In low-risk patients undergoing TAVR, anticoagulation with warfarin could prevent leaflet dysfunction at short term with no excess bleeding. 

Original Title: Randomized Trial of Aspirin Versus Warfarin After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.

Reference: Toby Rogers et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan;14(1):e009983. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009983.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

 

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....