Surgeons’ Claim on Low-Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis

Recent randomized trials including low-risk patients showed positive results for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) compared with surgical aortic valve replacement.

El reclamo de los cirujanos en estenosis aórtica de bajo riesgo

However, surgeons argue that these cases fail to consider patients from daily clinical practice, but rather include a population that has been carefully selected for randomized trials.

Patients with non-tricuspid aortic stenosis, with severe coronary artery disease, and requiring concomitant mitral/tricuspid/ascending aorta valve interventions were systematically excluded from such trials.

This study included all consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk (Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS] score of < 4%), who had undergone surgery within a certain period of time (2000-2019). Of 5310 tested patients, a high percentage (40.8%) showed at least one medical condition that would have had them excluded from randomized trials.

The most frequent medical conditions included aortic stenosis in a non-tricuspid valve (27.6%), severe coronary artery disease (5.8%), concomitant mitral disease (5.8%), and ascending aorta disease (10.5%).


Read also: Should Total Occlusion Influence on Revascularization Strategy?


The rates of stroke and 30-day mortality for the whole cohort of low-risk patients were 2.4% and 1.9%, respectively. The global mortality rate was similar to the rate for patients with severe coronary artery disease (2.6%) and ascending aorta disease (2.1%). The global mortality rate was lower than the rate for patients with non-tricuspid disease (0.9%) and higher than the rate for patients with concomitant mitral disease (5.9%).

Conclusion

In a real-world setting, about one half of the patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk show at least one medical condition that was excluded from randomized trials comparing TAVR and surgical valve replacement.

The results corresponding to this large cohort were similar to or better than those predicted by risk scores in all groups, except for patients with concomitant mitral disease.

These results shall be taken into account when choosing a strategy with patients from daily clinical practice, as well as when designing future trials.

Original Title: Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Outside Randomized Trials.

Reference: Alberto Alperi et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jan 19;77(2):111-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.056.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Spontaneous Left Main Dissection: Clinical Characteristics, management and Outcomes

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Spontaneous left main dissection in an uncommon, and potentially life-threatening, cause of acute MI. The aim of this study,...

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...