The FDA Approves Intravascular Lithotripsy for Calcified Lesions

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared the shockwave lithotripsy system to treat severely calcified plaque lesions.

La FDA aprueba la litotricia intravascular para lesiones calcificadas

The device uses a balloon to release pressure sound waves capable of passing through the softest material, and possibly rupture calcified plaque and optimize stent implantation.

As such, it has the potential to replace or, at least add to, the options available for these lesions, namely rotational atherectomy and orbital atherectomy. In this competition, a small detail should be noted: lithotripsy is significantly more expensive than both atherectomies, so its use must be rationalized.

Authors believe this new tool can improve the results without adding additional risks, thus expanding the population to be treated. The costs, with their different variables, will be adjusted over time. Its simplicity as regards use and the absence of a learning curve should do the rest.

The DISRUPT CAD III study was designed to include the same population, and the same definitions and endpoints, as ORBIT II (the orbital atherectomy pivot study).


Read also: The Most Read Articles of 2021: COVID-19.


This FDA publication and the Disrupt CAD III paper arrive late to the SOLACI archives; at the time this news emerged, we were focused on the pandemic and how to weather urgent cases during the storm. 

This type of news that have been left on the back burner will gradually be published, as they can give us a lot to talk about and, above all, can significantly change how we do things.

j-jacc-2020-09-603

Título original: La FDA aprueba la litotricia intravascular para lesiones calcificadas.

Referencia: Jonathan M. Hill et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:2635–46 y aprobado por la FDA en febrero.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....