The FDA Approves Intravascular Lithotripsy for Calcified Lesions

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared the shockwave lithotripsy system to treat severely calcified plaque lesions.

La FDA aprueba la litotricia intravascular para lesiones calcificadas

The device uses a balloon to release pressure sound waves capable of passing through the softest material, and possibly rupture calcified plaque and optimize stent implantation.

As such, it has the potential to replace or, at least add to, the options available for these lesions, namely rotational atherectomy and orbital atherectomy. In this competition, a small detail should be noted: lithotripsy is significantly more expensive than both atherectomies, so its use must be rationalized.

Authors believe this new tool can improve the results without adding additional risks, thus expanding the population to be treated. The costs, with their different variables, will be adjusted over time. Its simplicity as regards use and the absence of a learning curve should do the rest.

The DISRUPT CAD III study was designed to include the same population, and the same definitions and endpoints, as ORBIT II (the orbital atherectomy pivot study).


Read also: The Most Read Articles of 2021: COVID-19.


This FDA publication and the Disrupt CAD III paper arrive late to the SOLACI archives; at the time this news emerged, we were focused on the pandemic and how to weather urgent cases during the storm. 

This type of news that have been left on the back burner will gradually be published, as they can give us a lot to talk about and, above all, can significantly change how we do things.

j-jacc-2020-09-603

Título original: La FDA aprueba la litotricia intravascular para lesiones calcificadas.

Referencia: Jonathan M. Hill et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:2635–46 y aprobado por la FDA en febrero.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....