The FDA Approves Intravascular Lithotripsy for Calcified Lesions

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared the shockwave lithotripsy system to treat severely calcified plaque lesions.

La FDA aprueba la litotricia intravascular para lesiones calcificadas

The device uses a balloon to release pressure sound waves capable of passing through the softest material, and possibly rupture calcified plaque and optimize stent implantation.

As such, it has the potential to replace or, at least add to, the options available for these lesions, namely rotational atherectomy and orbital atherectomy. In this competition, a small detail should be noted: lithotripsy is significantly more expensive than both atherectomies, so its use must be rationalized.

Authors believe this new tool can improve the results without adding additional risks, thus expanding the population to be treated. The costs, with their different variables, will be adjusted over time. Its simplicity as regards use and the absence of a learning curve should do the rest.

The DISRUPT CAD III study was designed to include the same population, and the same definitions and endpoints, as ORBIT II (the orbital atherectomy pivot study).


Read also: The Most Read Articles of 2021: COVID-19.


This FDA publication and the Disrupt CAD III paper arrive late to the SOLACI archives; at the time this news emerged, we were focused on the pandemic and how to weather urgent cases during the storm. 

This type of news that have been left on the back burner will gradually be published, as they can give us a lot to talk about and, above all, can significantly change how we do things.

j-jacc-2020-09-603

Título original: La FDA aprueba la litotricia intravascular para lesiones calcificadas.

Referencia: Jonathan M. Hill et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:2635–46 y aprobado por la FDA en febrero.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...

Perforation Management in Bifurcations: Bench Testing of Bailout with Covered Stents

Coronary perforations during PCI are one of the most dreaded complications in interventional cardiology, especially in bifurcations. Though rate, this critical situation requires an...

EMERALD II: Non-Invasive Coronary Anatomy and Physiology (CCTA) in ACS Prediction

Despite steady progress in secondary prevention and medical treatment optimization (OMT), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbimortality....

Left or Right Transradial Approach? Comparing Radiation Exposure in Coronary Procedures

Radiation exposure during percutaneous procedures is a problem both for patients and operators. The transradial is currently the preferred approach, vs. femoral; however, whether...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...

Perforation Management in Bifurcations: Bench Testing of Bailout with Covered Stents

Coronary perforations during PCI are one of the most dreaded complications in interventional cardiology, especially in bifurcations. Though rate, this critical situation requires an...

Transapical TMVR in High Risk Patients: Intrepid 5-Year Outcomes

Moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) continues is still a high prevalence condition with bad prognosis, particularly among the elderly with left ventricular...