The FDA Approves Intravascular Lithotripsy for Calcified Lesions

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared the shockwave lithotripsy system to treat severely calcified plaque lesions.

La FDA aprueba la litotricia intravascular para lesiones calcificadas

The device uses a balloon to release pressure sound waves capable of passing through the softest material, and possibly rupture calcified plaque and optimize stent implantation.

As such, it has the potential to replace or, at least add to, the options available for these lesions, namely rotational atherectomy and orbital atherectomy. In this competition, a small detail should be noted: lithotripsy is significantly more expensive than both atherectomies, so its use must be rationalized.

Authors believe this new tool can improve the results without adding additional risks, thus expanding the population to be treated. The costs, with their different variables, will be adjusted over time. Its simplicity as regards use and the absence of a learning curve should do the rest.

The DISRUPT CAD III study was designed to include the same population, and the same definitions and endpoints, as ORBIT II (the orbital atherectomy pivot study).


Read also: The Most Read Articles of 2021: COVID-19.


This FDA publication and the Disrupt CAD III paper arrive late to the SOLACI archives; at the time this news emerged, we were focused on the pandemic and how to weather urgent cases during the storm. 

This type of news that have been left on the back burner will gradually be published, as they can give us a lot to talk about and, above all, can significantly change how we do things.

j-jacc-2020-09-603

Título original: La FDA aprueba la litotricia intravascular para lesiones calcificadas.

Referencia: Jonathan M. Hill et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:2635–46 y aprobado por la FDA en febrero.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...