Is Epinephrine Superior to Adenosine in No-REFLOW?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome, no-reflow prevalence is 32%. Different drugs—such as adenosine, verapamil, nitroprusside, or nicardipine— have been used for its intracoronary treatment, thus resulting in arterial hypotension.

¿Es superior la epinefrina a la adenosina en No-REFLOW?

The aim of this randomized study was to determine the effectiveness of the use of intracoronary epinephrine vs. adenosine in normotensive patients.

The primary endpoint was improvement in coronary flow assessed by TIMI flow, frame count, and myocardial blush. The secondary endpoint was in-hospital death, short-term death, and major cardiovascular events.

A total of 201 patients were included; 101 received epinephrine and 100, adenosine. The mean age was 57 years, most patients were male and hypertensive, and almost half of them had diabetes. The most frequent form of presentation in both groups was STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction) and the anterior descending artery was the most frequently affected artery. Pre-treatment TIMI I flow was present in 60% of patients.

Effectiveness was superior in patients who received epinephrine administration with TIMI III end flow (90.1% vs. 78%, p = 0.019), while there were no significant differences in myocardial blush or the secondary endpoint.

Read also: Bypass Grafting and Native Coronary Artery Disease Activity.

Epinephrine was well tolerated with few major adverse effects (2% of patients suffered from ventricular tachycardia).

Conclusion

Epinephrine is relatively safe for use in no-reflow in patients with normotension in acute coronary syndrome. The significant increase in post-treatment TIMI III flow, with a non-significant improvement in myocardial blush, makes intracoronary epinephrine a more effective alternative to adenosine.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board, SOLACI.org

Original Title: Comparison of Intracoronary Epinephrine and Adenosine for No-Reflow in Normotensive Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome (COAR Trial).

Reference: Kamran Ahmed Khan, et al Circulation Volume 15, Issue 2, February 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

AHA 2024 – BPROAD

Hypertension (elevated blood pressure, BP) is the most common comorbidity among diabetic patients and has been associated with higher cardiovascular risk, though as a...

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...