Is There Any Difference in Clinical Outcomes Between Transient and Persistent Acute Kidney Injury in ACS Patients after Invasive Treatment?

Acute kidney injury (AKI) following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with prolonged hospital stay and worse prognosis at followup. However, serum creatinine level increase can either be transient or permanent. At present, retrospective studies show transient AKI patients present similar survival rate to patients with no AKI. The prognostic implications of transient and persistent AKI remain uncertain.   

Una nueva molécula para evitar la nefropatía por contraste

The aim of this sub-study was to assess transient vs. persistent AKI predictors and prognosis in ACS patients randomized to an invasive strategy for the multicenter MATRIX trial (Minimizing Adverse Hemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of Angiox).

Primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days, defined as all cause death, AMI, stroke, and Net Adverse Cardiovascular Events (NACE) defined as the composite of MACE or BARCIII or V major bleeding. 

Secondary end point included primary end point components and cardiovascular mortality, transient ischemic attack, and target vessel revascularization. It also included ischemic events and bleeding at one year. 

Of a total 8201, AKI occurred in 16.3% of patients. 7.2% was transient and 9.1% persistent. Persistent AKI patients were older and mostly women. 

Read also: One Year Prognosis of Atherosclerotic vs. Non-Atherosclerotic Lesions in MINOCA Patients.

When comparing no AKI patients against persistent AKI patients, the latter showed higher MACE rate at 30 days (P<0.001) and one year (P<0.001). They were also associated to higher cardiovascular mortality rate and bleeding BARC III or V at 30 days (P<0.001) and one year (P<0.001). 

Transient AKI showed no differences in primary or secondary end points at 30 days but did show significant difference at one year as regards MACE (P=0.019) and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (P=0.011). 

After multivariable analysis, while there was no difference against transient AKI patients, persistent AKI patients had higher MACE rate vs. no AKI patients (P<0.001) as well as higher all-cause mortality (P<0.001) at 30 days.  

Conclusion 

Persistent AKI was associated to higher MACE and NACE rates at 30 days in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive treatment. However, this difference was not observed in transient AKI patients.   

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the editorial board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Transient vs In-Hospital Persistent Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Reference: Antonio Landi, MD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

A New Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Paradigm? CREST-2 Trial Unified Results

Severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis continues to be controversial seeing the optimization of intensive medical therapy (IMT) and the availability lower periprocedural risk revascularization techniques....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...