Is There Any Difference in Clinical Outcomes Between Transient and Persistent Acute Kidney Injury in ACS Patients after Invasive Treatment?

Acute kidney injury (AKI) following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with prolonged hospital stay and worse prognosis at followup. However, serum creatinine level increase can either be transient or permanent. At present, retrospective studies show transient AKI patients present similar survival rate to patients with no AKI. The prognostic implications of transient and persistent AKI remain uncertain.   

Una nueva molécula para evitar la nefropatía por contraste

The aim of this sub-study was to assess transient vs. persistent AKI predictors and prognosis in ACS patients randomized to an invasive strategy for the multicenter MATRIX trial (Minimizing Adverse Hemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of Angiox).

Primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days, defined as all cause death, AMI, stroke, and Net Adverse Cardiovascular Events (NACE) defined as the composite of MACE or BARCIII or V major bleeding. 

Secondary end point included primary end point components and cardiovascular mortality, transient ischemic attack, and target vessel revascularization. It also included ischemic events and bleeding at one year. 

Of a total 8201, AKI occurred in 16.3% of patients. 7.2% was transient and 9.1% persistent. Persistent AKI patients were older and mostly women. 

Read also: One Year Prognosis of Atherosclerotic vs. Non-Atherosclerotic Lesions in MINOCA Patients.

When comparing no AKI patients against persistent AKI patients, the latter showed higher MACE rate at 30 days (P<0.001) and one year (P<0.001). They were also associated to higher cardiovascular mortality rate and bleeding BARC III or V at 30 days (P<0.001) and one year (P<0.001). 

Transient AKI showed no differences in primary or secondary end points at 30 days but did show significant difference at one year as regards MACE (P=0.019) and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (P=0.011). 

After multivariable analysis, while there was no difference against transient AKI patients, persistent AKI patients had higher MACE rate vs. no AKI patients (P<0.001) as well as higher all-cause mortality (P<0.001) at 30 days.  

Conclusion 

Persistent AKI was associated to higher MACE and NACE rates at 30 days in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive treatment. However, this difference was not observed in transient AKI patients.   

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the editorial board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Transient vs In-Hospital Persistent Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Reference: Antonio Landi, MD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Treatment Outcomes According to a Worldwide Registry

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a highly limiting condition that, despite its moderate incidence, significantly impacts patient prognosis and quality of life. The...

Contemporary Outcomes of Acute Limb Ischemia Endovascular Revascularization

Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a vascular emergency with high mortality rate. It has been defined as a sudden occlusion of limb perfusion compromising...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...