One Year Prognosis of Atherosclerotic vs. Non-Atherosclerotic Lesions in MINOCA Patients

The use of intravascular imaging helps improve diagnosis in situations where a conventional coronary angiography might not be conclusive. That is the case of patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery lesions (MINOCA). The largest MINOCA cohort reported so far has shown 5%-7% prevalence. 

Pronóstico al año en lesiones ateroscleróticas vs las no ateroscleróticas en pacientes con MINOCA

This pathology, initially considered benign, presents a remote mortality rate of 4.7% on average, and it was observed that, at 4-year followup, 25% of these patients presented a major cardiovascular event (MACE). MINOCA has heterogeneous etiology and can be caused by lesions both atherosclerotic (including plaque rupture, plaque erosion and calcified nodules) and non-atherosclerotic (vessel spasm, microvascular dysfunction, and spontaneous coronary dissection).

The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of atherosclerotic MINOCA (At-MINOCA) vs non-atherosclerotic MINOCA (No-At-MINOCA) in terms of MACE (death, myocardial infarction, culprit vessel revascularization, stroke, rehospitalization) during 12 months after MINOCA diagnosis. 

A retrospective analysis of 7423 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was carried out, 294 presenting MINOCA (4% of the analyzed cohort). 190 received OCT at diagnosis. Myocarditis, cardiomyopathies or PTE patients were excluded. Primary end point was MACE at 12-month followup. 

Mean age was 55, 25.3% were women and 13.7% were diabetic. Most patients presented ST elevation ACS with (62.1%) and the most frequently involved artery was the anterior descending (64.7%). When looking at myocardial perfusion according to TIMI, there were ≥90 flow cases, mainly among No-At patients (major microvascular dysfunction). 

Among At-MINOCA patients (52.1% of the cohort) there was plaque erosion in 33.7%, plaque rupture in 17.4% and calcified nodules in 1.1%, while among the No-At-MINOCA cohort 4.2%saw spontaneous coronary dissection, 4.7% coronary spasm, and 38.9% were of unclassified cause. 86% of patients with atherosclerosis saw thrombi, mainly white (61.2%).

Read also: AHA 2020 | In Most Cases, Imaging Can Determine What Causes MINOCA.

Compared against No-At-MINOCA, At MINOCA patients presented worse clinical outcomes, with higher MACE rate (15.3% vs 4.5%; P=0.015), higher culprit vessel revascularization (6.1% vs 0%, P=0.030) and higher rehospitalization rate for progressive angina (6.1% vs 0%; P=0.030), with no difference in mortality. 

Atherosclerosis etiology was an independent predictor of primary end point when adjusting for sensitivity, with HR 5.36 (CI 1.08-26; P=0.04).

Conclusions

In 61.1% of cases, researchers were able to determine the underlying cause of MINOCA with the use of OCT. Plaque erosion was the main diagnosis in At MINOCA patients. At one year, these patients with atherosclerosis findings (mainly men and smokers) presented significantly higher events rate (HR 5.36), mainly because of revascularization and hospitalization for progressive angina.

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the editorial board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of MINOCA Caused by Atherosclerotic and Nonatherosclerotic Mechanisms Assessed by OCT.

Reference: Ming Zeng, Chen Zhao, Xiaoyi Bao, Minghao Liu, Luping He, Yishuo Xu, Wei Meng, Yuhan Qin, Ziqian Weng, Boling Yi, Dirui Zhang, Shengfang Wang, Xing Luo, Ying Lv, Xi Chen, Qianhui Sun, Xue Feng, Zhanqun Gao, Yanli Sun, Abigail Demuyakor, Ji Li, Sining Hu, Giulio Guagliumi, Gary S. Mintz, Haibo Jia, Bo Yu, Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of MINOCA Caused by Atherosclerotic and Nonatherosclerotic Mechanisms Assessed by OCT, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...