Non-ST Elevation MI: How Long Do We Have for A Coronary Angiography?

This summary discusses the early invasive strategy and the risk of mortality in non-ST-elevation AMI.


Over the past 2 decades, mortality and complications rates have seen a significant reduction thanks to technological and pharmaceutical development, and the increasing experience of health teams. This is especially true when we look at the use of coronary angiography withing 72 hours of symptom onset; in these cases, mortality risk has gone from 3 to 6 months. 

IAM sin elevación del ST: ¿cuánto tiempo tenemos para realizar una coronariografía?

At present, the information is contradicting when it comes to an early invasive strategy. Even though some registries and randomized studies have not shown improvement, this might be the result of different factors, such as the time between symptom onset and the coronary angiography. 

The KAMIR-NIH with 5856 non-ST myocardial infarction patients (NSTEMI) was analyzed: 3919 of these patients had a symptom onset to catheter time (StC) of <48 hours (66.9%) and 1937 a >48-hr StC.

Primary end point was all cause mortality at 3 years and secondary end point was the composite of all cause death, repeat MI or rehospitalization for cardiac failure at 3 years. 

Mean age was 64 and over 70% were men. 

Read also: Is Rehospitalization a Relevant Factor after Aortic Valve Replacement?

Patients presenting <48 hr. StC more often presented hypertension, diabetes, kidney function deterioration, MI, typical angina, angina after the first episode, less cardiac failure, lower GRACE score and better left ventricular function. 

StC was 17.5 hrs. vs 90.8 hrs.

The presence of left main severe stenosis was 5.6%, 3 vessel disease 19%, 2 vessel lesion 28% and one vessel lesion 45%. PCI was done in 85% of cases, CABG in 1.5% and the rest received optimal medical treatment.   

Primary end point at 3 years was 7.3% vs. 13.4% (3-year adjusted HR: 0.76; 95% CI:0.64-0.91; P = 0.002) for <48 hr. StC patient vs >48 hr StC patients respectively. Secondary end point was also in favor of <48 hr StC (12.2% vs. 19.6% 3-year adjusted HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73-0.96; P=0.015).

Read also: Is it Possible to Reduce DAPT Time in Diabetic Patients?

The use of emergency systems was associated to <48 hr StC and lower mortality.

Conclusion

An early invasive strategy based on symptom to catheter time was associated to lower all-cause mortality risk in NSTEMI patients. Seeing as this is a prospective registry, this conclusion should be considered as hypothesis generator to encourage future research. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Early Invasive Strategy Based on the Time of Symptom Onset of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Reference: SungA Bae, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023;16:64–75.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: does it really help reduce contrast use?

Contrast-induced nephropathy remains a relevant complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and complex coronary anatomies. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap...

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...