AHA 2023 | MINT: Liberal vs Restrictive Transfusion in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

The aim of this study was to assess hard end points such as death or MI in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presenting hemoglobin levels lower than 10 mg/dl. It was a randomized multicenter double blind trial including 3506 participants.

AHA 2023 | MINT: transfusión liberal vs restrictiva en pacientes con síndromes coronarios agudos

The study looked at different transfusion strategies, comparing restrictive strategy with 7-8 g/dl hemoglobin level cutoff vs. a liberal strategy with 10 g/dl hemoglobin level cutoff. Primary end point was a composite of all-cause death and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at 30 days. 

Primary end point was observed in 16.9% of patients with restrictive transfusion and in 14.9% of liberal transfusion patients, with RR 1.15 (confidence interval 95%: 0.99-1.34; p=0.07). 

When looking at secondary outcomes, there was a non-significant increase in mortality (RR 1.19, CI 95% 0.96-1.47) and AMI (RR 1.19, CI 95% 0.94-1.49).

Read also: AHA 2023 | SELECT Trial: Semaglutide in Patients Without Diabetes.

These findings indicate a liberal strategy could offer clinical benefits with a moderate risk for anemic patients with ACS.

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Presented by  Jeffrey Carson at the Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, 2023.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...