Coronary Sinus Reducer for Refractory Angina: Notes from the REDUCER-I Study

Refractory angina is defined as the presence of ischemic symptoms that cannot be controlled through optimal medical therapy (OMT) or interventional treatment. Patients who suffer from it often have significantly impaired quality of life (QoL) and impose high costs on healthcare systems. Therefore, the main objective of treatment in such cases is to reduce symptoms, improve QoL, and minimize the need for recurrent hospitalization.

The Reducer (Shockwave Medical Inc.) is a device designed to decrease the diameter of the coronary sinus (CS), creating a focal narrowing that promotes redistribution of myocardial blood flow to the ischemic subendocardium. Previous studies, such as COSIRA and ORBITA-COSMIC, have shown that this device can significantly reduce episodes of angina.

The REDUCER-I study is a non-randomized observational study that assessed the effectiveness and safety of the device in a large and complex cohort of patients with non-revascularizable refractory angina in 9 European sites. Recently, researchers presented an interim analysis with the results at 3 years.

The primary effectiveness endpoint was the percentage of patients who experienced improvement in their functional angina class (according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society) at 6 months compared to baseline. The primary safety endpoint included the incidence of severe periprocedural adverse events and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 30 days from implantation.

Read also: DCB-BIF: estudio aleatorizado de balón con drogas para el ramo lateral tras provisional stenting.

A total of 382 patients were included and 97.1% of them received the device (95.3% on the first attempt). The average age was 68.8 years, and 78% of subjects were men. Additionally, 73.6% had a history of myocardial revascularization surgery (MRS), 72.2% had CCS class III-IV angina, and 66.1% were on treatment with three or more anti-anginal medications.

At baseline, patients had an average CCS score of 2.8±0.6, which improved to 1.8±0.8 at 6 months (-0.9±0.8; P <0.0001). Among patients with disabling angina (CCS III-IV, 72%), only 18.2% remained in this category at 6 months, while 69.8% improved by at least one functional class and 24.1% improved by two or more classes.

In terms of safety, the incidence of MACE at 30 days was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7%-3.6%). Six cases of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were reported within the first 30 days, but none were related to the procedure. Furthermore, the rate of severe adverse events was 1.1%, including one case of AMI, one pericardial effusion event, and three cases of device migration.

Read also: Trends in the Treatment of Critical Lower Limb Ischemia.

Quality of life (QoL) scores measured by the SAQ questionnaire and angina frequency showed significant improvements compared to baseline (P <0.0001). In the 3-year interim analysis, patients in follow-up maintained a sustained reduction in CCS functional class, with fewer than 20% remaining in CCS III-IV (P <0.0001).

Conclusions

Reducer implantation in this complex population resulted in a significant reduction in CCS functional class in nearly 70% of patients, with benefits sustained at 6 months and at 3 years. Additionally, the procedure proved to be safe, with few adverse events reported.

Original Title: Coronary Sinus Narrowing for Treating Refractory Angina. REDUCER-I Multicenter “Real-World” Observational Study Primary Endpoint Analysis

Reference: Verheye S, van de Hoef TP, de Silva R, van Kuijk JP, Byrne J, Montorfano M, Buschmann E, Dupont M, West NEJ, Banai S; REDUCER-I Study Investigators. Coronary Sinus Narrowing for Treating Refractory Angina: REDUCER-I Multicenter “Real-World” Observational Study Primary Endpoint Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Dec 23;17(24):2908-2918. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.08.047. Epub 2024 Nov 6. PMID: 39520437.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...