Aspirin vs. Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1 Month of ACS: Subgroup Analysis Based on Bleeding Risk and MI Type

Current guidelines still recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the standard treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). As alternative strategies, monotherapy with aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor after short-term DAPT (1–6 months) are also considered to reduce the bleeding risk. However, the choice between aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor for monotherapy up to one year after PCI is based on treatment alternatives assessed in previous clinical trials, and to date, aspirin monotherapy has not been directly compared with clopidogrel after short-term DAPT in patients with ACS.

To define appropriate antiplatelet strategies, two key factors must be considered: high bleeding risk (HBR) and ACS type (ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] or non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]). The recently published one-year results of the STOPDAPT-3 trial (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-3) showed that aspirin monotherapy, compared to clopidogrel, was associated with similar cardiovascular and bleeding risks between the first month and one year after PCI.

The aim of this subanalysis of multicenter, randomized STOPDAPT-3 study was to evaluate the effects of aspirin versus clopidogrel monotherapy in patients with ACS through subgroup analysis based on the presence or absence of HBR and the type of MI (STEMI or NSTEMI).

The primary endpoint (PEP) was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke. Major bleeding was also assessed according to BARC types 3 or 5.

Researchers analyzed a total of 4353 patients, of whom 1711 had HBR (39.3%) (aspirin group: n = 847; clopidogrel group: n = 864), and 2457 had STEMI. There were no statistically significant differences between aspirin and clopidogrel for cardiovascular outcomes in subgroups with or without HBR (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61–1.30] and 1.08 [95% CI: 0.61–1.90]; p for interaction = 0.59) or in the STEMI and NSTEMI subgroups (HR: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.68–1.50] and 0.81 [95% CI: 0.48–1.37]; p for interaction = 0.51).

Read also: Compliance Coronaria post IVL.

Similarly, there were no significant differences in bleeding risk between subgroups based on hemorrhagic risk (HR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.40–1.33] and 0.71 [95% CI: 0.23–2.24]; p for interaction = 0.97) or between the STEMI and NSTEMI subgroups (HR: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.46–2.01] and 0.53 [95% CI: 0.24–1.17]; p for interaction = 0.28).

Conclusion

In patients with ACS, aspirin monotherapy after one month of DAPT and clopidogrel monotherapy showed similar cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes from one month to one year after PCI, regardless of bleeding risk or ACS subtype (STEMI or NSTEMI).

Original Title: Aspirin vs Clopidogrel 1 Month After Acute Coronary Syndrome With High-Bleeding Risk or ST-Segment Elevation.

Reference: Yuki Obayashi, MD et al JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...