Aspirin vs. Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1 Month of ACS: Subgroup Analysis Based on Bleeding Risk and MI Type

Current guidelines still recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the standard treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). As alternative strategies, monotherapy with aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor after short-term DAPT (1–6 months) are also considered to reduce the bleeding risk. However, the choice between aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor for monotherapy up to one year after PCI is based on treatment alternatives assessed in previous clinical trials, and to date, aspirin monotherapy has not been directly compared with clopidogrel after short-term DAPT in patients with ACS.

To define appropriate antiplatelet strategies, two key factors must be considered: high bleeding risk (HBR) and ACS type (ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] or non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]). The recently published one-year results of the STOPDAPT-3 trial (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-3) showed that aspirin monotherapy, compared to clopidogrel, was associated with similar cardiovascular and bleeding risks between the first month and one year after PCI.

The aim of this subanalysis of multicenter, randomized STOPDAPT-3 study was to evaluate the effects of aspirin versus clopidogrel monotherapy in patients with ACS through subgroup analysis based on the presence or absence of HBR and the type of MI (STEMI or NSTEMI).

The primary endpoint (PEP) was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke. Major bleeding was also assessed according to BARC types 3 or 5.

Researchers analyzed a total of 4353 patients, of whom 1711 had HBR (39.3%) (aspirin group: n = 847; clopidogrel group: n = 864), and 2457 had STEMI. There were no statistically significant differences between aspirin and clopidogrel for cardiovascular outcomes in subgroups with or without HBR (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61–1.30] and 1.08 [95% CI: 0.61–1.90]; p for interaction = 0.59) or in the STEMI and NSTEMI subgroups (HR: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.68–1.50] and 0.81 [95% CI: 0.48–1.37]; p for interaction = 0.51).

Read also: Compliance Coronaria post IVL.

Similarly, there were no significant differences in bleeding risk between subgroups based on hemorrhagic risk (HR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.40–1.33] and 0.71 [95% CI: 0.23–2.24]; p for interaction = 0.97) or between the STEMI and NSTEMI subgroups (HR: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.46–2.01] and 0.53 [95% CI: 0.24–1.17]; p for interaction = 0.28).

Conclusion

In patients with ACS, aspirin monotherapy after one month of DAPT and clopidogrel monotherapy showed similar cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes from one month to one year after PCI, regardless of bleeding risk or ACS subtype (STEMI or NSTEMI).

Original Title: Aspirin vs Clopidogrel 1 Month After Acute Coronary Syndrome With High-Bleeding Risk or ST-Segment Elevation.

Reference: Yuki Obayashi, MD et al JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Hemodynamic Outcomes of Edge-to-Edge Repair in Degenerative and Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) has become an established therapeutic option for mitral valve disease. Among the available techniques, M-TEER using the MitraClip...