Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Edge-to-Edge Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is characterized by severe ventricular dysfunction, most often of ischemic origin. It is frequently associated with severe mitral regurgitation (MR), either due to primary mitral valve disease from ruptured chordae tendineae or papillary muscles, or—less commonly—from mixed causes.

While surgery is the treatment of choice in CS patients, that is not a feasible alternative in certain scenarios due to high associated risk. In such cases, edge-to-edge repair becomes a valid therapeutic strategy.

Researchers conducted an analysis on 30 patients with CS (19 with Impella support and the remainder with intra-aortic balloon pump, IABP), all with degenerative or functional moderate or severe mitral regurgitation, who were not surgical candidates and were treated with edge-to-edge therapy using MitraClip.

The average age was 74 years; 19 subjects were men, and the STS predicted mortality for valve repair was 13.8%. The patients’ medical history included diabetes in 6 patients, hypertension in 22, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 6 (5 requiring oxygen permanently), prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 11, myocardial revascularization surgery (MRS) in 4, atrial fibrillation in 15, pacemaker implantation in 11, stroke in 3, and peripheral vascular disease in 3. The mean creatinine level was 1.6 mg/dL.

Read also: Watchman FLX and Improvement Impact vs. 2.5.

The average ejection fraction was 40%. The left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 55 mm, and the end-systolic diameter was 43 mm. Six patients had moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, 2 had moderate or severe aortic stenosis, and 18 had moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation.

The average time from admission to edge-to-edge treatment was 2.1 days.

The procedure was successful in 25 patients; in 2 cases, severe MR persisted after the procedure, and in 3 cases, the procedure could not be completed. The final transmitral gradient was ≤5 mmHg.

Read also: Chronic Stent Recoil and Its Long-Term Effects.

Hospital survival, 30-day survival, and 6-month survival rates were 86.6%, 80%, and 73.3%, respectively. At 30 days, the distribution of MR grades was: MR 1+ in 62% of subjects, 2+ in 19%, 3+ in 15%, and 4+ in 4% of patients.

Conclusion

In patients with cardiogenic shock complicated by mitral regurgitation, edge-to-edge treatment with mandatory ventricular support proved to be a safe strategy and was associated with favorable clinical outcomes.

Original Title: Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair and Mandatory Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Structural Shock. 

Reference: David G. Rizik, el al. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions 4 (2025) 10262 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2025.102626


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Deep vein arterialization as an alternative in patients with critical limb ischemia without conventional options

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents one of the most advanced stages of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In a significant proportion of patients, distal anatomy,...