AHA 2018 | New Dyslipidemia Guidelines Support Non-Statin Therapy and Coronary Artery Calcium Screening

While the guidelines do not recommend a specific treatment target, they suggest additional therapy in high-risk patients with LDL 70 mg/dL or higher.

Las nuevas guías de dislipemia apoyan la terapia sin estatinas y la búsqueda de calcio coronarioThese new guidelines from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) start recommending ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibition in select high-risk patients and proposing noninvasive coronary artery calcium screening with computerized tomography to help make decisions about patients who fall into the gray zone.

 

These new guidelines, presented at the American Heart Association (AHA) Congress (and published simultaneously in Circulation), took 18 months and feature 72 recommendations, including 29 that are class I. Similarly to all guidelines, they recommend a healthy lifestyle for all age groups.


Read also: Highlights from TCT 2018.


High cholesterol is both preventable and treatable, and these guidelines will give clinicians the tools they need to converse with patients and come up with individually-tailored treatment.

 

These guidelines emphasize that having high cholesterol at any age significantly increases cardiovascular risk, recommending early risk assessment, even among children and young adults.

 

In a secondary prevention setting, there is now a class I indication for reducing LDL levels by 50% or more with a high-intensity statin (atorvastatin 40-80 mg or rosuvastatin 20-40 mg), or the maximally tolerated dose in all patients with evidence of cardiovascular disease.


Read also: Highlights from ESC 2018.


For very-high-risk patients (multiple cardiovascular events and risk factors) and those with LDL ≥70 mg/dL, the guidelines recommend adding ezetimibe to the maximally tolerated statin dose (class IIa). If LDL still remains ≥ 70 mg/dL, a PCSK9 inhibitor such as alirocumab or evolocumab (class IIa) could be added. However, guidelines state that the long-term safety of these monoclonal antibodies is unknown.

 

In patients with primary hypercholesterolemia who have LDL levels ≥190 mg/dL, physicians should start a high-intensity statin treatment regardless of the risk at 10 years.

 

For diabetic patients from 40 to 75 years old, the guidelines recommend a moderate-intensity statin treatment regardless of the risk at 10 years (class I). If a diabetic patient has other risk factors or is ≥50 years old, an intensive treatment (class IIa) can be considered.

 

A significant change from previous guidelines is that current ones recommend monitoring patients 4 to 12 weeks after starting therapy to assess its effect and, then, continued monitoring every 3 to 12 months thereafter.

 

Original title: 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guidelines on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Reference: Grundy SM et al. Circulation. 2018; Epub ahead of print.

 

Nuevas-guias-Dislipemia


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...