TCT 2020 | Surprising Differences in Stroke between SAPIEN 3 and Evolut R

One-year outcomes of the head to head trial between CoreValve Evolut R vs Sapien 3 showed a significantly higher difference in stroke vs. patients receiving the self-expanding valve (Sapien 3 6.9% vs Evolut R 1%; p=0.002).

The SOLVE-TAVI randomized 2×2 patients with severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk to Sapien 3 or Evolut R and general anesthesia or conscious sedation. 

Both devices resulted comparable for the combined end point of death, stroke, moderate to severe aortic regurgitation and the need of new definite pacemaker

The difference in stroke is surprising and difficult to explain since the number observed in this study for the Sapien 3 greatly exceeds the one observed in other studies, such as the SOURCE 3 and the PARTNER 3, which had used the same device. 

Between 30 days and one year there were no significant differences in stroke, therefore they were peri-procedural strokes. 


Read also: TCT 2020 | Fewer Symptoms and Events when Optimizing with iFR.


All-cause mortality resulted practically identical (17.6% with Evolut R vs 17.0% with Sapien 3; p=0.88), moderate to severe aortic regurgitation rate favored the Sapien 3 numerically, but not significantly (7.0% with Evolut R vs 4.5% with Sapien 3; p=0.35).

Definite pacemaker rate was relatively high and similar between devices (24.7% with Evolut R vs 20.2% with Sapien 3; p=0.25).

As regards the comparison between conscious sedation and general anesthesia, mortality, stroke, MI, infection, and kidney injury rates were equivalent between strategies. 


Read also: TCT 2020 | The Myth of Biodegradable Polymers Seems to Have Come to an End.


Conscious sedation saw shorter intensive care unit stay and shorter total hospital stay. A cost analysis that should favor conscious sedation is expected. 

Original Title: SOLVE-TAVI investigators. A 2 x 2 randomized trial of self-expandable vs balloon-expandable valves and general vs local anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 1-year result.

Reference: presentado por Feistritzer H-J en el congreso TCT 2020 virtual.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | Extended follow-up of the TRI-FR study: Edge-to-edge percutaneous repair in isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with chronic systemic venous congestion, recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure (HF), and a significant deterioration in quality of...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Therapeutic strategies in carotid free-floating thrombus: evidence and controversies

Carotid free-floating thrombus (cFFT) is a rare entity with a high embolic risk, associated with acute neurological events such as stroke or transient ischemic...

The Two Sides of the Coin: What Do CHAMPION-AF and CLOSURE-AF Teach Us About Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

Letter to the editor: Juan Manuel Pérez Asorey Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) is currently going through one of the most interesting stages of...

CLOSURE-AF: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, comparative...