Sapien 3 Performs Well in “Jobs” for Which It Is Not Designed

Using Sapien 3, transcatheter mitral valve replacement to treat failed bioprosthetic valves can be performed with a high degree of technical success.

Buen desempeño de la Sapien 3 en “trabajos” para los que no está diseñada

Failed mitral bioprosthetic valves are truly challenging due to how frequent symptoms are and the high morbidity/mortality associated with a new surgical replacement. Furthermore, there are no catheter options specifically designed to treat this issue.

Sapien 3 was developed as a last resource, but thanks to its good results, it is becoming a consistently good option.

Researchers analyzed prospectively all patients implanted with Sapien 3 to treat a failed mitral prosthesis between 2015 and 2019 included in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) registry. The primary efficacy endpoint was 1-year mortality, and secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality, New York Heart Association functional class, and valve performance.


Read also: Convalescent Plasma for Severe Pneumonia from COVID-19.


A total of 1529 patients were included; they had undergone a mitral valve-in-valve procedure through transseptal or transapical access in 295 sites. Technical success was achieved in 96.8% of patients and 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 5.4% and 16.7%, respectively.

Transseptal access was linked to lower 1-year mortality compared with transapical access (15.8% vs. 21.7%; p = 0.03). 

New valve implantation provided immediate and sustained symptomatic relief. Baseline New York Heart Association functional class was III/IV in 87.1% of patients vs. 9.7% after a year.

Conclusion

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement in failed mitral bioprosthetic valves was associated with high technical success, lower 30-day/1-year mortality rates, and significant improvement of heart failure symptoms.

This option should be considered for most patients with failed mitral bioprosthetic valve and favorable anatomy.

Original Title: One-Year Outcomes of Mitral Valve-in-Valve Using the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve.

Reference: Brian Whisenan et al. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(11):1245-1252. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2974.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...