Cusp Overlap for Higher CoreValve Implantation

Implant depth greater than the length of the membranous septum is an independent predictor of permanent pacemaker implantation. Valve implantation 3 to 5 mm below the aortic annulus in a projection coaxial to the device is recommended. The problem is this is rarely in the annular plane of the valve.

Cirugía para mejorar la sobrevida en insuficiencia tricuspidea aislada

Ideal annular plane projection is normally suggested by CT. For CoreValves, correction of parallax was achieved by adding right anterior oblique caudal angulation, which preserves the anatomic annular plane of the native valve and produces an overlap of right and left coronary cusps (cusp overlap).

This differs from manufacturer recommendation to use left anterior oblique angulation. This produces a shallower apparent device depth of 1 to 2 mm.

This technique could enable higher implantation, making the self-expandable valve more competitive in terms of conduction, vs balloon expandable valves. 

The risk of excessively higher implantation with this technique might increase paravalvular regurgitation, or even embolization.  


Read also: Should Total Occlusion Influence on Revascularization Strategy?


Small observational studies on cusp overlap have shown permanent pacemaker implantation rate lower than 5% for CoreValve and no significant increase in leak or device embolization. 

Implantation 3 to 5 mm below the aortic annulus, using a radiographic projection chosen for both the valve and the device can help improve permanent pacemaker implantation rate. 

This should be confirmed by multicenter registries, with special attention to low-risk population. 

CIRCINTERVENTIONS-120-009258free

Original Title Low Rates of Permanent Pacing Are Observed Following Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using an Annular Plane Projection for Deployment.

Reference: Anthony D. Pisaniello et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:e009258. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009258.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...