Renal Denervation, 24-Month Evolution

Hypertension is a very common condition, and generally manageable. However, as we know, it is associated to cardiovascular events. 

Even though the therapeutic arsenal enables us with drugs and drug combinations, in many occasions adequate control will elude us, or three or more drugs will be required. 

Renal denervation (RDN) has been shown effective to reduce hypertension in different studies, although important questions remain unanswered, such as efficacy over time and whether it offers benefits vs. conventional treatment. 

The SPYRAL HTN-ON MED was analyzed (a randomized controlled trial) including 337 hypertensive patients treated with 1 to 3 drugs with elusive results, defined as office systolic blood pressure (BP) >150 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg and diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg, or 24 hour ambulatory systolic BP >140 mmHg and≤170 mmHg. 206 of these patients received RDN.

Read also: Intravascular Lithotripsy vs. Rotational Atherectomy for Calcified Coronary Lesions.

The groups were comparable: on average, antihypertensive medication was 1.8 among RDN patients and 1.7 in the control group (CG); mean patient age was 55; 80 % were men; their history included heart disease in 6 % and stroke or TIA in 1 %; conserved kidney function. Baseline Office BP was 163/101 mmHg and ambulatory BP 149/96 mmHg.

At 6 months, crossover was allowed and 66 patients received RDN.

At 24 months, patients receiving RDN presented significantly reduced systolic BP in ambulatory BP (−12.1±15.3 mmHg [n=176] vs. −7.0±13.1 mmHg [n=33]; difference: −5.7 mmHg; P=0.039) and office BP groups (−17.4±16.1 mmHg [n=187] vs. −9.0±19.4 mmHg [n=35]; difference: −8.7 mmHg; P=0.0034) vs. the control group. Also, the increase in number of antihypertensives was greater in the control group vs RDN patients (1.7–2.7 vs. 1.8–2.8; P=0.046).

Read also: Is it Time to Give Up Aspirin after PCI in High Bleeding Risk Patients? A Critical Analysis of STOPDAPT-3.

Crossover patients also saw significantly reduced systolic BR vs. those who had received RDN from the start.

No patient presented severe renal stenosis at 24 months after RDN.

Conclusion

Renal denervation lead to a significant reduction of systolic BP, both in office and at 24-hour ambulatory monitoring vs. the control group, despite the latter used more antihypertensives. 

Hipertensión/denervasión renal

Original Title: Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation: 24-Month Results From the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Trial.

Reference: David E. Kandzar, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025;18:e015194. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015194.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

A New Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Paradigm? CREST-2 Trial Unified Results

Severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis continues to be controversial seeing the optimization of intensive medical therapy (IMT) and the availability lower periprocedural risk revascularization techniques....

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...